This paper analyses several dimensions of workers’ safety that are relevant in the context of a pandemic. We provide a classification of occupations according to the risk of contagion: by considering a wider range of job characteristics and a more nuanced assessment of infection risk, we expand on the previous literature that almost exclusively looked at feasibility of working from home. We apply our classification to the United States and to European countries and we find that roughly 50% of jobs in our sample can be considered safe, although a large cross-country variation exists, notably in the potential incidence of remote working. We find that the most economically vulnerable workers (low-educated, low-wage workers, immigrants, workers on temporary contracts, and part-timers) are over-represented in unsafe jobs, notably in non-essential activities. We assess the nature of the reallocation of workers from unsafe to safe jobs that is likely to take place in the years to come, and the policies that could mitigate the social cost of this reallocation.
The new hazardous jobs and worker reallocation
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
How transport modes, proximity and capacity shape accessibility across cities, towns and rural areas
30 June 202653 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from job vacancy data
28 May 202656 Pages -
10 February 202653 Pages
-
Working paper3 December 202568 Pages
-
Working paper
How to get robust comparisons across countries and over time
3 December 202557 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from labour market data
30 June 202571 Pages -
Working paper
Insights and examples from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study in New Zealand
30 June 202554 Pages -
Working paper
Cross‑country evidence on income mobility from tax record data
27 June 202545 Pages
Related publications
-
Policy paper5 September 202532 Pages
-
Working paper
A cross‑country perspective
13 November 202433 Pages