In many OECD countries, the majority of social spending is financed from earmarked revenues, and a large share of revenues earmarked for any type of government spending is used for social purposes. Tying revenue sources to specific expenditure categories has a number of potential advantages and weaknesses. These trade-offs depend on the design and implementation of earmarking, and they can become more apparent when fiscal space is tight. In practice, provisions for linking revenues to programme spending differ widely, and they vary also by social protection branch within countries. This paper compares financing patterns and trends and provides examples of earmarking for social insurance and assistance programmes. It concludes with a discussion of carbon pricing as a potential source of financing social support programmes.
Financing social protection in OECD countries
Role and uses of revenue earmarking
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
10 February 202653 Pages
-
Working paper3 December 202568 Pages
-
Working paper
How to get robust comparisons across countries and over time
3 December 202557 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from labour market data
30 June 202571 Pages -
Working paper
Insights and examples from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study in New Zealand
30 June 202554 Pages -
Working paper
Cross‑country evidence on income mobility from tax record data
27 June 202545 Pages -
27 June 202550 Pages
-
Working paper25 June 202590 Pages
Related publications
-
30 October 2025203 Pages -
24 July 2025130 Pages -
30 June 202528 Pages
-
25 June 202555 Pages
-
20 June 202555 Pages