Action 2 Neutralising the effects of hybrid mismatch arrangements
BEPS Action 2 called for the development of model treaty provisions and recommendations regarding the design of domestic rules to neutralise the effects of hybrid instruments and entities.
The work by OECD member states and Inclusive Framework member jurisdictions on BEPS Action 2 culminated in the 2015 OECD report on Neutralising the Effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements.
What is the issue?
Hybrid mismatch arrangements are used in aggressive tax planning to exploit differences in the tax treatment of an entity or instrument under the laws of two or more tax jurisdictions to achieve double non-taxation, including long-term taxation deferral.
Why does it matter?
These types of hybrid mismatch arrangements were widespread and resulted in a substantial erosion of the taxable bases of the jurisdictions concerned. These risks were highlighted in the context of international banking in the 2010 OECD report Addressing Tax Risks Involving Bank Losses and a subsequent review by various OECD member countries identified examples of tax planning using hybrid mismatch arrangements which led to the 2012 OECD report Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements: Tax Policy and Compliance issues. The 2012 report identified that hybrid mismatch arrangements, in addition to their impact on tax revenues, also have an overall negative impact on competition, efficiency, transparency and fairness.
What are we doing to solve it?
BEPS Action 2 recommendations target mismatches resulting from differences in the tax treatment of financial instruments or entities. The work on hybrid mismatches was subsequently expanded to deal with similar opportunities that arise through the use of branch structures, resulting in a 2017 OECD report Neutralising the Effects of Branch Mismatch Arrangements.
As part of the common approach to addressing hybrid mismatches, work continues amongst OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework members to share practical examples of these structures to ensure consistent, comprehensive and coherent outcomes from the application of the new rules.
What are the results so far?
Since announcement of the Action 2 recommendations, a number of Inclusive Framework countries have rapidly adopted rules to address a comprehensive range of hybrid and branch mismatches. The United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand have enacted legislation consistent with the common approach in Action 2 and, in 2019 the US Treasury issued regulations clarifying the application of the hybrid mismatch rules introduced under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. European Union Member States adopted Council Directive (EU) 2017/952 which requires hybrid and branch mismatch rules to be effective in member states no later than the beginning of 2020.
Compare your country
Discover the international state of play with this interactive map presenting key indicators and outcomes of the OECD's work on international tax matters.Discover More