This paper considers the choice between different approaches to contract for the construction and maintenance of infrastructure projects. The need to control for user costs over the life cycle of an asset is demonstrated to be a core aspect of contract design. The more likely it is that a certain problem in the current infrastructure could be sorted out in several different ways, the more strongly should the tendering agency consider innovative design alternatives such as performance contracts of Public Private Partnerships. It is also demonstrated that contracts which cover both construction and subsequent maintenance must be accompanied by bonuses and penalties for remunerating or punishing the entrepreneur for delivering (or not) appropriate infrastructure quality.
Procurement and Contract Design in the Construction Industry
… Not One Size Fits All
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
18 March 202123 Pages
-
17 March 202124 Pages
-
Working paper
Mobility as a Service from the User and Service Design Perspectives
28 January 202128 Pages -
Working paper27 January 202130 Pages
-
27 January 202120 Pages
-
Working paper
Principles, Issues and Policy Recommendations
27 January 202120 Pages
Related publications
-
Policy paper
The case of the Trans‑Caspian Transport Corridor
3 February 202648 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from a decomposition analysis for the OECD and the world
11 December 202530 Pages -
24 November 2025197 Pages -
5 August 202528 Pages