Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) are critical in supporting sustainable development. To date, there has been a limited level of analysis focused on their funding models. Key messages from this paper: 1) DFI funding models have material implications, whether they be linked to the instruments DFIs utilise to finance sustainable development, or to their ability to mobilise capital markets in support thereof. 2) Issuing bonds, including Green, Social and Sustainability (GSS) bonds, allows DFIs to leverage balance sheets through the mobilisation of private capital, offering investors access to the unique expertise of DFIs through familiar instruments. 3) There are advantages to diverging funding models, and risks associated with a uniform approach. Should they make use of the most appropriate funding model to take on specific and complementary segments of the demand for funding, individual DFIs would stand to add the benefits of specialisation to those of a complete product offering at the sector level.
The Funding Models of Bilateral Development Finance Institutions
A comparative analysis of Proparco, FMO and British International Investments
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
17 November 202539 Pages
-
Working paper14 November 202431 Pages
-
Working paper
How to make them work in developing countries, and how donors can help
11 March 202474 Pages -
Working paper
Progress towards Target 19 of the Kunming‑Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework
3 December 202347 Pages -
22 November 202397 Pages
-
22 November 202317 Pages
-
Working paper
Cooling the hotspots
22 November 202325 Pages -
14 November 202344 Pages
Related publications
-
Policy brief27 April 202612 Pages
-
20 April 202615 Pages -
Policy paper
Financing our futures
30 June 202520 Pages -
Policy brief30 June 202510 Pages
-
30 June 202512 Pages