In order to arrive at a fair comparison between countries regarding the fiscal burden of their DB public sector pension plans, this paper gathers more evidence on public sector pension plans regarding the type of pension promise and quantifies the future tax burden related to these pension promises. The reported liabilities are recalculated using both a fair value approach (local market discount rates) and a common, fixed discount rate across all countries which reflects projected growth in national income. We also estimate for a number of plans from a sample of OECD countries the size of the net unfunded liabilities in fair value terms as of the end of 2008. This fiscal burden can also be interpreted as the implicit pension debt in fair value terms.
Funding in Public Sector Pension Plans
International Evidence
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
Most countries have separate pension plan for public sector employees. The future fiscal burden of these plans can be substantial as the government usually is the largest employer, pension promises in the public sector tend to be relatively generous, and future payments have to be paid out directly from government revenues (pay-as-you-go) or by funded plans (pension funds) which tend to be underfunded. The valuation and disclosure of these promises in some countries lacks transparency, which may be hiding potentially huge fiscal liabilities that are being passed on to future generations of workers.
In the same series
-
Working paper
Evidence from Decentralised Exchanges (DEXs) and Automated Market Makers (AMMs)
25 April 202423 Pages -
31 July 202336 Pages
-
13 August 202039 Pages
-
6 August 202024 Pages
-
21 July 202050 Pages
-
Working paper30 March 202091 Pages
-
25 September 201774 Pages
-
Working paper15 March 201746 Pages
Related publications
-
1 December 2025132 Pages
-
21 October 202560 Pages
-
9 July 2025116 Pages