Key concepts of radioactive waste management, such as safety, risk, reversibility and retrievability, carry different meanings for the technical community and for non-technical stakeholders. Similarly, socio-economic concepts, including community, landscape and benefit packages, are interpreted differently by diverse societal groups. Opinions and attitudes are not simply a faithful reflection of decision making, actual events and communicated messages; perceptions and interpretations of events and objects also play a role. This report presents key issues and examples in order to build awareness of the importance of symbols and symbolism in communicating about perceptions and interpretations. It adds to the recognition that dialogue amongst stakeholders is shaped by dimensions of meaning that reach beyond dictionary definitions and are grounded in tradition and social conventions. A better understanding of these less obvious or conspicuous realities should help find additional ways of creating constructive relationships amongst stakeholders.
More than Just Concrete Realities
The Symbolic Dimension of Radioactive Waste Management
Report
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
8 January 2021112 Pages -
Report
Final Methodology
7 January 202192 Pages -
17 August 202051 Pages
-
24 March 2020182 Pages
Related publications
-
Report
Validation of Beginning-of‑Life Power Ramping (Case 3)
30 April 202468 Pages -
Report
Hypothetical Beginning-of‑Life Power Ramps (Cases 1 and 2)
30 April 202492 Pages -
Report
A Temperature Analysis Benchmark
31 October 2023123 Pages -
Report
Advances in the Analysis and Management of Accidents and Future Challenges
26 October 202340 Pages -
22 September 2023435 Pages