This study approaches the question whether it “pays” to live in big(ger) cities in a three-fold manner: first, it estimates how city size affects worker productivity (agglomeration benefits) in Germany, based on individual-level wage data. Second, it considers whether productivity benefits translate into real gains for workers by taking local price levels into account. Third, it examines the role of amenities in explaining differences in real benefits across cities. The estimated elasticity for agglomeration benefits is around 0.02, implying that comparable workers in Hamburg (3 million residents) are about 6% more productive than in Recklinghausen (150 000). But agglomeration benefits are, on average, offset by higher prices, i.e. city size does not systematically translate into real pecuniary benefits for workers. Amenities, e.g. seaside access, theatres, universities, or “disamenities”, e.g. air pollution, explain – to a large degree – variation in real pecuniary benefits, i.e. real wages are higher in low-amenity cities.
Does It Pay to Live in Big(ger) Cities?
The Role of Agglomeration Benefits, Local Amenities, and Costs of Living
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
26 October 202067 Pages
-
Working paper
Financial constraints across the urban‑rural hierarchy in a wealthy country with low regional disparities
19 October 202030 Pages -
23 September 202072 Pages
-
Working paper
How national governments can deliver affordable housing and compact urban development
15 April 202046 Pages -
Working paper
FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level
12 February 202050 Pages -
Working paper
Connecting the dots across industries, firms and places
13 January 202065 Pages -
17 December 201944 Pages
Related publications
-
29 June 20267 Pages -
29 June 202664 Pages