To adapt pension systems to demographic trends, many countries are reducing pay-as-you-go
public pension levels and lifting retirement ages. In this context, funded pensions could play a major
role to avoid adequacy gaps. Yet, as this paper shows, the coverage of funded private pensions, as
measured by enrolment rates, is highly uneven across countries and between individuals, especially in
voluntary systems.
Some countries have made funded pensions compulsory (e.g. Australia, Chile) or quasimandatory
(e.g. Denmark, the Netherlands) to ensure that most workers are covered and therefore
have access to a sufficiently high complementary pension. However, in other countries with relatively
low pay-as-you-go public pension benefits, funded private provision remains voluntary. The low level
of funded pensions’ coverage in such countries should be a major policy concern. Recent policy
initiatives in Germany and New Zealand, involving the introduction of financial incentives (and auto
enrolment in New Zealand) have been effective in raising coverage to the highest levels among
voluntary pension arrangements, but coverage gaps remain that need to be addressed.
Coverage of Private Pension Systems
Evidence and Policy Options
Working paper
OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
6 August 2020
-
21 July 2020
-
Working paper30 March 2020