- Policy
- ODA allocation overview
- ODA to and through the multilateral system
- Bilateral ODA
- Geographic, sectoral and thematic focus of ODA
- Private sector instruments
- Mobilised private finance
- Total Official Support for Sustainable Development
- Institutional set-up
- Quality and oversight
- Other profiles
- Additional resources
Table of contents
Switzerland has long-term partner country engagement in complex contexts, with a strong humanitarian tradition and a commitment to addressing fragility. Switzerland has an important voice in multilateral organisations. Switzerland’s total official development assistance (ODA) decreased in 2024 to USD 4.6 billion (preliminary data), representing 0.51% of gross national income.
This profile presents verified data on development assistance allocation. See the Development Co-operation Profiles.
Policy
Copy link to PolicySwitzerland’s International Cooperation Strategy 2025-28 identifies four objectives: 1) saving lives and supporting access to high-quality basic services; 2) contributing to sustainable economic development and the creation of decent jobs; 3) guaranteeing environmentally friendly and climate-resilient development; and 4) promoting peace and human rights and strengthening democracy and the rule of law. Within this strategy, Switzerland’s priority regions remain sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East and North Africa, with a stronger focus on Ukraine.
Switzerland sees its multilateral engagement as an important pillar of its development co-operation to address global and regional development challenges, including climate change, fragility, emergency relief and the integration of developing countries into the global economy. Switzerland uses multilateral partnerships to deliver emergency relief and encourage more pro-climate private sector investment in developing countries.
Findings from OECD-DAC reviews
Copy link to Findings from OECD-DAC reviewsThe 2025 OECD-DAC Peer Review praised Switzerland for the focus of its support to long-term and complex projects, its progress on fragility, its advanced system for measuring results, and the Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation’s responsible phasing-out of bilateral co-operation in Latin America and the Caribbean. The review recommended increasing the share of ODA allocated to least developed countries and ensuring a poverty focus consistently informs all programmes. The review stressed the importance of strengthening the management of human resources to attract and retain staff in fragile contexts and nurture thematic expertise. It also recommended increasing linkages across private sector instruments and ensuring ODA is untied. The Peer Review found that Switzerland had fully or partially implemented 12 of the 14 recommendations of the 2019 Peer Review. Switzerland’s 2025 DAC Peer Review will be published in mid-2025. Discover insights from Switzerland’s 2019 Peer Review and 2022 mid-term review, and learn from Switzerland’s practices in Development Co-operation Tools Insights Practices (TIPs).
ODA allocation overview
Copy link to ODA allocation overviewSwitzerland provided USD 4.6 billion (preliminary data) of ODA in 2024 (USD 4.4 billion in constant terms), representing 0.51% of GNI.1 This was a decrease of 14.9% in real terms in volume and in the share of GNI from 2023. Switzerland’s total ODA has been on an upward trend since 2020. Since 2021, Switzerland had been meeting its domestic objective of a 0.5% ODA/GNI ratio, which is lower than its international commitment to achieve a 0.7% ODA/GNI ratio by 2030. However, the budget envelope for 2025-28 will reduce the ODA/GNI ratio to 0.41%, or 0.36% excluding in-donor refugee costs. As Switzerland did not extend any loans during 2023 and all other instruments used were fully concessional, this conveys a grant element of 100%.
In 2024, Switzerland ranked 8th among Development Assistance Committee (DAC) countries when ODA is taken as a share of GNI. In 2023, Switzerland was among the DAC members that channelled the highest share of its bilateral ODA support to and through civil society organisations (CSOs) (27.3%). In 2023, Switzerland was the second-largest DAC member in terms of the share of gross bilateral ODA disbursements to fragile contexts given for peace (21.2%).
Switzerland has committed to several international targets and DAC standards and recommendations. Learn more about DAC Recommendations.
Switzerland: Performance against commitments and DAC Recommendations
Copy link to Switzerland: Performance against commitments and DAC Recommendations|
Description |
Target |
2022 |
2023 |
2024, preliminary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ODA as a share of GNI (%) |
0.7 |
0.56 |
0.60 |
0.51 |
|
Total ODA to least developed countries as a share of GNI (%) |
0.15-0.20 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
|
|
Share of untied ODA covered by the DAC Recommendation (%) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
|
Share of untied ODA (all sectors and countries beyond the scope of the Untying Recommendation) (%) |
98.1 |
98.1 |
||
|
Grant element of total ODA (%) |
>86 |
100 |
100 |
Note: This table only includes information about ODA data-related DAC Recommendations. ODA: official development assistance; GNI: gross national income; DAC: Development Assistance Committee.
Switzerland provided most of its ODA bilaterally in 2023. Gross bilateral ODA was 80.2% of total ODA disbursements. Twenty-one per cent of gross bilateral ODA was channelled through multilateral organisations (earmarked contributions).
ODA to and through the multilateral system
Copy link to ODA to and through the multilateral systemIn 2023, Switzerland provided USD 1.9 billion of gross ODA to the multilateral system, an increase of 6.2% in real terms from 2022. Of this, USD 1 billion was core multilateral ODA (19.8% of total ODA), while USD 851.3 million was non-core contributions earmarked for a specific country, region, theme or purpose. Project-type funding earmarked for a specific theme and/or country accounted for 28.6% of Switzerland’s non-core contributions and 71.4% was programmatic funding (to pooled funds and specific-purpose programmes and funds).
The United Nations (UN) system received 43.6% of Switzerland’s contributions to multilateral organisations, of which USD 534 million (64.7%) represented earmarked contributions. Out of a total volume of USD 825.4 million to the UN system, the top three UN recipients of Switzerland’s support (core and earmarked contributions) were World Food Programme (USD 114.2 million), the United Nations Development Programme (USD 113.3 million) and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (USD 84 million).
See the section on Geographic, sectoral and thematic focus of ODA for the breakdown of bilateral allocations, including ODA earmarked through the multilateral development system.
Learn more by exploring the dashboard on DAC members’ use of the multilateral system.
Bilateral ODA
Copy link to Bilateral ODAIn 2023, Switzerland’s bilateral spending increased compared to the previous year. It provided USD 4.2 billion of gross bilateral ODA (which includes earmarked contributions to multilateral organisations). This represented an increase of 4.9% in real terms from 2022.
In 2023, country programmable aid amounted to USD 1.4 billion, or 33% of Switzerland’s gross bilateral ODA, compared to the DAC country average of 43.1%. In-donor refugee costs were USD 1.5 billion in 2023, representing 34.7% of Switzerland’s gross bilateral ODA. This was an increase of 7.7% in real terms over 2022.
In 2023, Switzerland channelled its bilateral ODA mainly through public sector, non-governmental organisations and multilateral organisations. Technical co-operation made up 1.8% of gross ODA in 2023.
Civil society organisations
Copy link to Civil society organisationsIn 2023, CSOs received USD 1.1 billion of gross bilateral ODA, of which 12.3% was directed to developing country-based CSOs. Overall, 5.3% of gross bilateral ODA was allocated to CSOs as core contributions and 22% was channelled through CSOs to implement projects initiated by the donor (earmarked funding). From 2022 to 2023, the combined core and earmarked contributions for CSOs increased as a share of bilateral ODA, from 25.3% to 27.3%. Learn more about the DAC Recommendation on Enabling Civil Society in Development Co-operation and Humanitarian Aid.
Geographic, sectoral and thematic focus of ODA
Copy link to Geographic, sectoral and thematic focus of ODAIn 2023, Switzerland’s bilateral ODA primarily focused on countries in Africa. USD 762.1 million was allocated to countries in Africa and USD 370.3 million to Asia (excluding the Middle East), accounting respectively for 18.1% and 8.8% of gross bilateral ODA. USD 349.8 million were allocated to ODA-eligible countries in Europe (of which 45.9% was for Ukraine). Africa was also the main regional recipient of Switzerland’s earmarked contributions to multilateral organisations, in line with the policy priorities of its overall strategy.
In 2023, 14.6% of gross bilateral ODA went to Switzerland’s top 10 recipients. Its top 10 recipients are in priority countries including Ukraine, and fragile contexts in the Middle East, West Africa and Asia. The share of gross bilateral ODA not allocated by country was 59.3%, of which 58.4% consisted of expenditures for processing and hosting refugees in provider countries.
In 2023, Switzerland allocated 0.13% of its GNI to the least developed countries (LDCs). Switzerland allocated the highest share of gross bilateral ODA (16.9%) to LDCs in 2023, noting that 59.3% was unallocated by income group. Additionally, Switzerland allocated 11.8% of gross bilateral ODA to land-locked developing countries in 2023, equal to USD 495.2 million.
Looking at the distribution of Switzerland’s ODA in relation to “ODA per person in extreme poverty”,2 the amount was USD 1.6 per person in LDCs, USD 1.4 in lower middle-income countries and USD 5.2 in upper middle-income countries (UMICs).
In 2024 , Switzerland provided USD 197.7 million of net bilateral ODA to Ukraine to respond to the impacts of Russia’s full-scale invasion, a 18.8% increase from 2023 in real terms. USD 20.7 million of the amount was humanitarian assistance in 2024, a 33.6% decrease from 2023.
Responding to fragility
Copy link to Responding to fragilitySupport to contexts with high and extreme fragility was USD 962.2 million in 2023, representing 22.8% of Switzerland’s gross bilateral ODA. Thirty-six per cent of this ODA was provided in the form of humanitarian assistance, an increase from 25% in 2022, while 21.2% was allocated to peace, a decrease from 23.9% in 2022. Four per cent of gross bilateral ODA went to conflict prevention, a subset of contributions to peace, representing a decrease from 4.5% in 2022. Learn more about the OECD States of Fragility platform.
Sectors
Copy link to SectorsIn 2023, the largest focus of Switzerland’s bilateral ODA was to support refugees in donor countries (USD 1.5 billion). The administrative costs of donors amounted to USD 220.9 million. ODA for social infrastructure and services totalled USD 1.2 billion, with a focus on government and civil society (USD 550.8 million). Humanitarian assistance amounted to USD 650.4 million (15.6% of bilateral ODA). Earmarked contributions to multilateral organisations also focused on social sectors and other macro sectors in 2023.
Gender equality
Copy link to Gender equalityIn the period 2022-23, Switzerland committed 67.6% of screened bilateral allocable ODA to gender equality and women’s empowerment, compared to 63.2% in 2020-21,3 and a DAC average of 45.8% in 2022-23. This is equal to USD 1.9 billion of screened bilateral allocable ODA in support of gender equality on average per year. In addition:
The share of screened bilateral allocable ODA committed to gender equality and women’s empowerment as a principal objective was 3.6% in 2022-23, compared with the DAC average of 4%.
Switzerland includes gender equality objectives in 43.5% of ODA for humanitarian aid, above the 2022-23 DAC average of 18.4%.
Switzerland screens all bilateral allocable ODA activities against the DAC gender equality policy marker (100% in 2022-23).
Switzerland committed USD 21.2 million of ODA to end violence against women and girls and USD 19 million to support women’s rights organisations and movements, and government institutions on average in 2022-23.
Learn more about the DAC Recommendation on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of All Women and Girls in Development Co-operation and Humanitarian Assistance and the DAC Recommendation on Ending Sexual Exploitation in Development Co-operation, and by exploring the dashboard on DAC members’ development finance for gender equality.
Environment
Copy link to EnvironmentIn 2022-23, Switzerland committed 30.1% of its total bilateral allocable ODA (USD 832.5 million) in support of the environment and the Rio Conventions, up from 27.2% in 2020-21. The DAC average was 39% in 2022-23. In addition:
Five per cent of screened bilateral allocable ODA focused on environmental issues as a principal objective, compared with the DAC average of 9.6%.
Twenty-six per cent of total bilateral allocable ODA (USD 721.5 million) focused on climate change overall, up from 23.2% in 2020-21 (the DAC average was 34.8%). Switzerland had a greater focus on adaptation (22.4%) than on mitigation (14.7%) in 2022-23.
Nine per cent of screened bilateral allocable ODA (USD 245.4 million) focused on biodiversity overall, up from 6.3% in 2020-21 (the DAC average was 7.6%).
Learn more about the DAC Declaration on Aligning Development Co-operation with the Goals of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.
Switzerland: Performance against environment and Rio Markers, 2022-2023
Copy link to Switzerland: Performance against environment and Rio Markers, 2022-2023|
Marker |
Constant 2023 USD million |
% of bilateral allocable |
|---|---|---|
|
Environment |
832.5 |
30.1 |
|
Rio Markers: |
||
|
Biodiversity |
245.4 |
8.9 |
|
Desertification |
105.9 |
3.8 |
|
Climate change mitigation only |
101.6 |
3.7 |
|
Climate change adaptation only |
314.7 |
11.4 |
|
Both climate change mitigation and adaptation |
305.2 |
11 |
Note: Individual Rio Markers should not be added up as this can result in double counting.
Poverty focus and other policy objectives
Copy link to Poverty focus and other policy objectivesIn 2023, Switzerland:
Allocated 6.8% of its bilateral ODA (USD 287.8 million) to core poverty-reducing sectors as defined by Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 1.a.1. This indicator captures grants to basic social services (such as basic health and education, water supply and sanitation) and development food aid. A further 0.4% of bilateral ODA (USD 16.6 million) went to social protection support.
Committed USD 489.9 million (19.9% of its bilateral allocable ODA) to address the immediate or underlying determinants of malnutrition in developing countries across a variety of sectors, such as emergency response, government and civil society, and water supply and sanitation.
Committed USD 146.8 million (6% of its bilateral allocable ODA) to development co-operation projects and programmes that promote the inclusion and empowerment of persons with disabilities.
Committed USD 39.4 million (1.6% of its bilateral allocable ODA) to the mobilisation of domestic resources in developing countries. Regarding the payment of local tax and customs duties for ODA-funded goods and services, Switzerland generally seeks exemptions and makes this information available on the OECD Digital Transparency Hub on the Tax Treatment of ODA.
Private sector instruments
Copy link to Private sector instrumentsTo build markets in developing countries and incentivise greater mobilisation of private resources for development, many providers, including Switzerland, have established development finance institutions (DFIs) and similar vehicles that extend private sector instruments (PSI). The Swiss Investment Fund for Emerging Markets (SIFEM) was assessed as an ODA-eligible PSI vehicle. PSI represented 0.5% of Switzerland’s ODA in 2023 while the DAC average stood at 1.3%.
In 2023, Switzerland’s SIFEM extended USD 84.9 million in the form of PSI to developing countries.4 Of this, loans accounted for 23.1% whereas equities accounted for 76.9%.
In 2023, USD 34.7 million (40.8%) of Switzerland’s PSI were allocated to middle-income countries and UMICs, with UMICS receiving 23.6% in particular. USD 50.3 million was unallocated by income. Switzerland’s PSI primarily supported projects in the industry, mining and construction (53%) and banking and financial services (22.1%) sectors.
Mobilised private finance
Copy link to Mobilised private financeSwitzerland uses leveraging mechanisms to mobilise private finance for sustainable development. In 2023, Switzerland’s State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and the Swiss Investment Fund for Emerging Markets (the Swiss development finance institution) mobilised USD 188.7 million from the private sector through simple co-financing, shares in collective investment vehicles and direct investment in companies and special purpose vehicles. This constituted a significant increase compared to 2022.
Private finance mobilised by Switzerland in 2022-23 mainly targeted middle-income countries, representing 9% of its total mobilised. Only 3.8% of total mobilised private finance during this period benefited the LDCs and other low-income countries, noting that 87.1% was unallocated by income.
Mobilised private finance by Switzerland in 2022-23 related mainly to activities in energy (29.6%), as its top sector. Furthermore, over this period, 70.4% of Switzerland’s total mobilised private finance was for climate action.
Total Official Support for Sustainable Development
Copy link to Total Official Support for Sustainable DevelopmentTotal Official Support for Sustainable Development (TOSSD) is an international statistical standard that monitors and increases transparency of all official and officially supported resources for financing the SDGs in developing countries, as well as for addressing global challenges. In 2023, activities reported by Switzerland as TOSSD totalled USD 7.4 billion, up from USD 6 billion in 2022. Switzerland’s TOSSD activities mostly targeted SDG 10 (reduced inequalities), SDG 17 (partnerships for the Goals) and SDG 5 (gender equality). Activity-level data on TOSSD by recipient are available at: https://tossd.online.
Institutional set-up
Copy link to Institutional set-upThree institutions share responsibility for Switzerland’s development co-operation: the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); the Division of Peace and Human Rights within the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs; and the Economic Cooperation and Development Division of SECO within the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research. Every four years, the Swiss parliament adopts its Dispatch on International Cooperation, which sets strategic objectives for the country’s development and humanitarian assistance. The latest dispatch was approved in 2024 for the period 2025-28. A “Fit for Purpose” restructuring process took place within the SDC in 2022, and the institution is now divided into three geographical divisions, one thematic division, one multilateral division, one humanitarian division, and one division responsible for transversal dossiers and core processes. The consultative Interdepartmental Committee for International Development and Cooperation (IKEZ) brings together various departments aiming at informing and co-ordinating international co-operation policy. The Swiss Federal Audit Office regularly assesses aspects of Swiss co-operation; for instance, it published a report on development co-operation in vocational and professional education and training in 2024.
There are in total around 1 877 full-time equivalents (FTE) working in international co-operation, most of whom are local staff (around 1 000 FTE).
Switzerland has a consultative and consensus-based system of government, and the preparation of the Strategy for 2025-28 involved broad public consultation. Several CSOs active in development co‑operation, humanitarian assistance and global citizenship education co-ordinate under the umbrella body Alliance Sud.
Quality and oversight
Copy link to Quality and oversightInternal systems and processes help ensure the effective delivery of Switzerland’s development co‑operation. Select features are shown in the table below.
Switzerland: Systems for quality, effectiveness and oversight
Copy link to Switzerland: Systems for quality, effectiveness and oversight|
Data reporting systems |
The OECD provides regular feedback to members on the overall quality of their statistical reporting and works with each member to ensure the data meet high-quality standards before they are published. Regarding DAC/CRS reporting to the OECD, Switzerland’s reporting in 2023 was very late but complete and accurate. |
|
Quality assurance |
Quality assurance within the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) has clear processes, strong knowledge management and a quality assurance network. SECO’s ISO certification and recertification exercises help streamline quality assurance processes. |
|
Risk management |
Switzerland’s risk management is guided by the principle of subsidiarity, where each administrative unit maps, assesses and manages its own risks, supported by risk coaches. The Monitoring System for Development-Related Changes assesses political, economic, social, environmental and security risks across projects. The FDFA’s audits ensure comprehensive oversight and adaptive risk management across Switzerland’s development efforts. |
|
Innovation and adaptation |
Switzerland’s International Cooperation Strategy 2025-2028 puts an emphasis on innovation, and particularly on collaboration with the private sector, digitalisation and emerging technologies. |
|
Effectiveness |
The 4th global monitoring round of Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (2023-26) is underway. Information on partner countries’ participation, progress and results is available at the Global Dashboard. Results for 14 countries and a mid-term observations brief are available on the dashboard, with additional updates forthcoming. Switzerland endorsed the Donor Statement on Supporting Locally Led Development and the Grand Bargain and is developing a policy on locally led development co-operation. |
|
Results management |
Switzerland has introduced an advanced system for measuring results, “Results Data Management” (RDM). The RDM software digitalises logframes and results frameworks, allowing project officers and partners to report results in one shared system to easily analyse and share the collected data. |
|
Evaluation |
Independent evaluations are used as a management tool, serving for operational steering, institutional learning and accountability. Both the SDC and SECO have centralised evaluation functions, mandating thematic, institutional and programme evaluations. Joint evaluations can be conducted on issues of common responsibility. Embassies and co‑operation offices in partner countries are also responsible for evaluations of specific development and humanitarian projects. Learn more about Switzerland’s evaluation system. Visit the DAC Evaluation Resource Centre for evaluations of Switzerland’s development co-operation. |
|
Knowledge management and learning |
Thematic networks have proven effective in creating and disseminating knowledge in both SECO and the SDC. |
|
Communication and transparency |
The SDC’s social media strategy aims to explain its activities and contribution to international co-operation and the broader Swiss foreign policy. It also aims to promote dialogue and build bridges with audiences and realistic and constructive critical awareness of global challenges. |
Other profiles
Copy link to Other profilesAccess the full list of providers at this link: Development Co-operation Profiles.
Additional resources
Copy link to Additional resources2022 OECD-DAC mid-term review of Switzerland: https://one.oecd.org/document/DCD/DAC/AR(2024)3/19/en/pdf
2019 OECD-DAC Peer Review of Switzerland: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264312340-en
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC): https://www.eda.admin.ch/sdc
State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO): https://www.seco.admin.ch/seco/en/home/Aussenwirtschaftspolitik_Wirtschaftliche_Zusammenarbeit/Wirtschaftliche_Zusammenarbeit_Entwicklung.html
CSO umbrella organisation Alliance Sud: https://www.alliancesud.ch/en
Switzerland has been a member of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) since 1968.
The methodological notes provide further details on the definitions and statistical methodologies applied, including the grant-equivalent methodology, core and earmarked contributions to multilateral organisations, country programmable aid, channels of delivery, bilateral ODA unspecified/unallocated, bilateral allocable ODA, the gender equality policy marker, and the environment markers.
This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Member countries of the OECD.
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.
Note by the Republic of Türkiye
The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Türkiye recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Türkiye shall preserve its position concerning the “Cyprus issue”.
Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union
The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Türkiye. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
© OECD 2025
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. By using this work, you accept to be bound by the terms of this licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Attribution – you must cite the work.
Translations – you must cite the original work, identify changes to the original and add the following text: In the event of any discrepancy between the original work and the translation, only the text of original work should be considered valid.
Adaptations – you must cite the original work and add the following text: This is an adaptation of an original work by the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this adaptation should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its Member countries.
Third-party material – the licence does not apply to third-party material in the work. If using such material, you are responsible for obtaining permission from the third party and for any claims of infringement.
You must not use the OECD logo, visual identity or cover image without express permission or suggest the OECD endorses your use of the work.
Any dispute arising under this licence shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) Arbitration Rules 2012. The seat of arbitration shall be Paris (France). The number of arbitrators shall be one.
Notes
Copy link to Notes← 1. DAC members adopted the grant-equivalent methodology starting from their reporting of 2018 data as a more accurate way to count the donor effort in development loans. See the methodological notes for further details.
← 2. Aid per person in extreme poverty is calculated by dividing net ODA (bilateral and imputed multilateral) by the population in extreme poverty in each country. Group averages are calculated based on a weighted average of aid per person in extreme poverty and the number of people in extreme poverty for each country in the group. For more information on this indicator, please see here.
← 3. The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of ODA reported as being focused on gender equality.
← 4. In 2023, the DAC agreed on revised reporting methods for measuring PSI in ODA based on ODA grant equivalents. Members may, however, take up to two years to transition to the new methods, with their PSI continuing to be accounted for on a net ODA basis during the transition period.
Other profiles
- A - C
- D - I
- J - M
- N - R
- S - T
- U - Z