Illicit trade

Task Force on Countering Illicit Trade (TF-CIT)

The OECD Task Force on Countering Illicit Trade (TF-CIT) works with governments to better understand the full range of complex risks and threats posed to our global economies.

The TF-CIT focuses on evidence-based research and advanced analytics to assist policy-makers map and understand the market vulnerabilities exploited and created by illicit trade.   

Enhancing transparency on Free Trade Zones

Free Trade Zones (FTZs) facilitate trade by offering businesses advantageous tariffs and lighter regulation on financing, ownership, labor and immigration, and taxes. However, OECD evidence shows that the gains from reduced customs presence in FTZs can offer opportunities for illicit trade. There is a risk that, without additional transparency and oversight, the economic benefits from FTZs could be jeopardized.

To address this issue, the OECD has designed the “Recommendation of the Council on Countering Illicit Trade: Enhancing Transparency in Free Trade Zones." The Recommendation includes a Code of Conduct for Clean Free Trade Zones. The TF-CIT has been working on an assessment framework to check the compliance of a zone with the Code of Conduct. Work is nearing completion and the results will be published shortly.

Please note that there is no existing FTZ assessment or certification scheme that has been approved, endorsed or prepared in collaboration with the OECD.


E-commerce is a modern and flexible solution for consumers and businesses. The COVID-19 crisis accelerated an expansion of e-commerce, but also increased the abuse of e-commerce platforms by criminals running illicit trade networks.


Misuse of containerized maritime transport

Traffickers continue to use all available modes of transport for illicit trade. OECD evidence indicates a larger number of individual seizures in small shipments (through air-travel and road transport); however, seizures from commercial maritime container shipping continue to dominate in terms of volume and value of goods seized.

A factual report prepared by the TF-CIT, together with the EUIPO provides empirical evidence about the abuse of container ships in international trade in counterfeits. It also suggest the main routes of trade with containers polluted with illicit trade. Finally, the report outlines the economic landscape for containerized maritime transport and investigates policy gaps that enable its misuse by criminals in illicit trade, and about the governance and economic drivers and policy gaps that enable them.

Wildlife trafficking

The TF-CIT developed a set of original quantitative exercises that sheds additional information on the ways trade routes of wildlife trafficking are shaped, and on related governance gaps that enable them.

Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods

Counterfeiting is a significant risk for knowledge-based, open & globalized economies, and illicit in counterfeit goods is a very dynamic and constantly changing phenomenon. Continuous measurement efforts are needed to monitor this risk. To provide policymakers with substantial empirical evidence for taking action against this threat, the OECD and the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) joined forces to gauge this threat in a rigorous, analytical way.

We also enhance country-specific evidence on the damagind impact of counterfeiting on innovative, knowledge-based economies. Our quantitative studies examine the impact of the imports of fake products to a country and the impact of the global trade in counterfeit products that infringe on innovative companies' IP rights based in the analyzed country. 

Illicit trade in dangerous goods

Illicit trade in counterfeit and substandard goods causes not only economic damage, but also poses additional risks to citizens, including health and safety risk. risks. These challenges become even more significant with the COVID-19 pandemic, which opens new opportunities for profits for criminals running illicit trade networks. The OECD Task Force on Countering Illicit Trade has been actively gauging these risks, and scoping relevant policy replies. 

More information.