Three essential goals of pension plan funding are the long-term viability, stability and security of member benefits. Reform of funding regulations for defined benefit (DB) pension schemes to make them more counter-cyclical in nature can help achieve these goals as well as make DB schemes more attractive to plan sponsors that are increasingly moving away from DB towards defined contribution plans. If designed properly, funding regulations could help maintain DB systems for the long-term and provide greater member security. Broadly speaking, DB funding regulations should (i) encourage deficit reduction contributions and appropriate build up of surplus when plan sponsor finances are strong; (ii) help maintain predictable costs and dampen volatility; and, (iii) give plan sponsors more control to manage risks and costs.
This paper discusses the impact of the crisis on DB pension schemes and the temporary responses taken by regulators to help ease financially strained plan sponsors. Furthermore, the paper presents suggestions to governments and policy-makers for making funding regulations more counter-cyclical in nature. Such measures could strengthen the security of DB benefits and help to maintain DB plans for future workers.
The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Defined Benefit Plans and the Need for Counter‑Cyclical Funding Regulations
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
Evidence from Decentralised Exchanges (DEXs) and Automated Market Makers (AMMs)
25 April 202423 Pages -
31 July 202336 Pages
-
13 August 202039 Pages
-
6 August 202024 Pages
-
21 July 202050 Pages
-
Working paper30 March 202091 Pages
-
25 September 201774 Pages
-
Working paper15 March 201746 Pages
Related publications
-
9 July 2025116 Pages -
19 February 202530 Pages
-
Policy paper13 December 202373 Pages