An increasing amount of empirical evidence documents that city-size distribution within a country follows a power law, often in the form of Zipf’s law. This paper provides new comparative evidence on city size distribution across OECD countries. It uses a database where urban agglomerations are consistently identified across different countries, through an algorithm based on population density and commuting patterns. The paper investigates whether Zipf’s law fits well with data. A robustness check is carried out using a traditional administrative definition of cities. Results show that Zipf’s law describes well city size distribution not only at country level, but also at wider spatial scales. The law does not fit as well with the data when using a traditional administrative definition of cities.
On City Size Distribution
Evidence from OECD Functional Urban Areas
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
26 October 202067 Pages
-
Working paper
Financial constraints across the urban‑rural hierarchy in a wealthy country with low regional disparities
19 October 202030 Pages -
23 September 202072 Pages
-
Working paper8 June 202026 Pages
-
Working paper
How national governments can deliver affordable housing and compact urban development
15 April 202046 Pages -
Working paper
FDI spillovers and competition effects at the local level
12 February 202050 Pages -
Working paper
Connecting the dots across industries, firms and places
13 January 202065 Pages -
17 December 201944 Pages
Related publications
-
18 June 2026164 Pages -
Policy paper18 June 202647 Pages
-
Policy paper18 June 202655 Pages
-
18 June 202659 Pages
-
18 June 202656 Pages
-
Policy paper18 June 202647 Pages