Measuring policy progress on agriculture and water policies is essential to help decision makers identify necessary policy changes and understand how further progress may be achieved to improve agricultural water management. A thorough review of existing evaluations of agriculture and water policies suggests three types of progress to be measured: policy design, policy implementation capacity and policy results. The quality and robustness of these measures of policy progress depends upon three main factors. First, assessment of policy design requires matching policy alignment with cross cutting objectives or with a reference text. Second, assessment of progress in implementation capacity requires gauging evolution towards predefined capacity needs or identified governance gaps. Third, evaluation of policy results requires clearly defined objectives, timelines and scales for assessments. Seven practical options are identified for applying these principles to agriculture and water policies, illustrated by applying them to assessing progress in the sustainable management of water for irrigation under climate change and in controlling diffuse nutrient pollution.
Measuring progress in agricultural water management
Challenges and practical options
Policy paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
17 February 202673 Pages
-
Working paper
Economic analysis, literature findings and synthesis
28 May 202590 Pages -
Working paper
Impacts on the triple challenge and cost‑benefits analysis
22 May 202527 Pages -
Working paper
A literature review on policy effectiveness
9 May 202547 Pages -
Working paper
Case study of the Australian beef and wheat sectors
2 April 202580 Pages -
21 February 202570 Pages
-
Working paper
Evidence from 40 countries
19 February 202539 Pages -
14 February 202529 Pages
Related publications
-
Report
Framework, indicator methodology and results
29 October 202575 Pages -
Working paper
Reinforcing global food markets
1 August 202549 Pages -
Working paper
Impacts on the triple challenge and cost‑benefits analysis
22 May 202527 Pages -
12 May 202530 Pages
-
18 April 202558 Pages