Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia have been touted as models for other developing countries of how liberalisation can bring faster growth and greater equity. In fact their performance has been mixed and often inferior to other Asian economies, notably in structural change, tax reform, industrialisation, education and democratisation. Liberalisation and globalisation in finance, trade and investment has harmed redistribution and growth, as well as a country’s ability to “catch up,” except where governments have successfully intervened. The Washington Consensus and its argument that there is no alternative must be rejected. A solution must be founded on greater government competence, transparency and accountability, along with technology and a revival of regional and international solidarity and co-operation ...
Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
Evidence on data availability and quality in 18 countries
28 May 202640 Pages -
13 November 202556 Pages
-
Working paper
Reinforcing global food markets
1 August 202549 Pages -
27 June 202536 Pages
-
Working paper
Methodology and the example of the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake
27 June 202537 Pages -
27 June 202536 Pages
-
24 April 202554 Pages
-
Working paper
Historical perspectives from the 1850s‑1930s
17 April 202550 Pages
Related publications
-
Report
A Statistical Instrument to Assess Deeply Rooted Gender‑based Discrimination in Social Institutions
10 June 202576 Pages -
Working paper14 May 202567 Pages