Government support for agricultural risk management tools has grown substantially over the past two decades. While these tools can play a role in strengthening farm-level resilience by helping farmers to cope with the financial impact of adverse events, they also modify farmers’ incentives to invest in risk-reducing measures and market tools. Policy design is critical to maximise effectiveness while minimising unintended consequences. This report reviews the accumulated experience on four types of publicly-supported agricultural risk management tools (ex post disaster aid, agricultural insurance, income stabilisation schemes and tax and savings measures). It suggests some basic principles on how countries can improve the design of their agricultural risk management policies, using a holistic approach and focusing on market failures. The report also highlights the need for more transparency on basic programme data, and for periodic public evaluation of existing programmes.
Design principles for agricultural risk management policies
Policy paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
Comparing available options and estimating trends for three OECD case study countries
20 July 202679 Pages -
15 June 202656 Pages
-
3 June 202620 Pages
-
17 February 202673 Pages
-
Working paper
Economic analysis, literature findings and synthesis
28 May 202590 Pages -
Working paper
Impacts on the triple challenge and cost‑benefits analysis
22 May 202527 Pages -
Working paper
A literature review on policy effectiveness
9 May 202547 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
Working paper
Private sector perceptions of barriers, opportunities and the future
6 July 202654 Pages -
15 June 202656 Pages