Global efforts to combat the risks posed by antimicrobial resistance (AMR) depend on effective implementation of national action plans. Most countries have taken a One Health approach in developing their national action plans covering human health, animal health and the environment. Evidence on the implementation of these plans in livestock agriculture across six OECD countries, as well as in Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, and the Russian Federation, highlights the need for greater co-ordination and coherence amongst stakeholders in implementing workable solutions. This includes developing integrated surveillance and monitoring systems, improving regulations on the availability of antibiotics, and improving on-farm biosecurity practices. Additional efforts to enhance public awareness, to improve education and training, and to explore alternative interventions and innovations to antimicrobials in animal health and animal welfare could also improve outcomes in this area. The lack of long-term funding continues to hinder the implementation of national action plans on AMR.
Assessing national action plans on antimicrobial resistance in animal production
What lessons can be drawn?
Policy paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper14 August 202636 Pages
-
Working paper
Comparing available options and estimating trends for three OECD case study countries
20 July 202679 Pages -
15 June 202656 Pages
-
3 June 202620 Pages
-
17 February 202673 Pages
-
Working paper
Economic analysis, literature findings and synthesis
28 May 202590 Pages -
Working paper
Impacts on the triple challenge and cost‑benefits analysis
22 May 202527 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
Better data systems for food trade monitoring in West Africa
7 August 202630 Pages -
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
Working paper
Private sector perceptions of barriers, opportunities and the future
6 July 202654 Pages -
15 June 202656 Pages