Over the past two decades, governments worldwide have continued to liberalise restrictions on international investment with only occasional relapses. Yet, FDI liberalisation remains an unfinished agenda in various parts of the world and across sectors. This paper sheds light on their potential costs in terms of foregone investments. Applying an augmented gravity model, covering 60 advanced and emerging countries over the period 1997–2016, it estimates the elasticity of bilateral FDI positions and cross-border M&A activity to FDI restrictions as measured by the OECD FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index. Results suggest that reforms liberalising FDI restrictions by about 10% as measured by the Index could increase bilateral FDI in stocks by 2.1% on average. Effects are greater for FDI in the services sector, but even manufacturing sectors – which are typically open to FDI – are negatively affected by countries’ overall restrictiveness. Foreign equity limitations and FDI screening policies are also scrutinised.
The determinants of Foreign Direct Investment
Do statutory restrictions matter?
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
New approaches for sustainable supply chains
11 April 202540 Pages -
Working paper
Evidence from investment funds
19 December 202439 Pages -
4 March 202445 Pages
-
Working paper
Initial insights from project‑level data
31 July 202341 Pages -
Working paper
A large‑sample survey of treaty provisions
12 April 202357 Pages -
Working paper30 November 202260 Pages
-
25 November 202221 Pages
-
Working paper
Methodology and initial findings for 36 developing countries
24 February 202265 Pages
Related publications
-
Policy brief31 October 202511 Pages
-
16 September 202528 Pages
-
Policy brief30 April 202512 Pages
-
Policy brief31 October 202412 Pages
-
23 January 202452 Pages