This study takes stock of the institutional setting, operational modalities, strengths and weaknesses of various forms of mutual recognition when used in different sector and country contexts. It aims to build a greater understanding of the benefits and pitfalls of one of the 11 mechanisms of international regulatory co-operation identified by the OECD Regulatory Policy Committee in OECD (2013), International Regulatory Co-operation: Addressing Global Challenges. The paper relies on an empirical stocktaking of mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) among selected OECD countries, the systematic review of mutual recognition clauses in trade agreements, case studies of the specific experience of the EU internal market, the Trans-Tasman arrangement, and the MRA between the US and the EU of 1998, and an extensive review of the literature.
The contribution of mutual recognition to international regulatory co‑operation
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
Including a pilot on efforts to regulate AI
12 May 202555 Pages -
26 March 202568 Pages
-
5 December 202472 Pages
-
Working paper
Viewpoints and beliefs about better regulation: A report from the “Q exercise”
4 October 202227 Pages -
Working paper
Evidence from ICAO’s North American, Central American and Caribbean and South American regions
10 September 202233 Pages -
Working paper
Civilian drones and bio‑solutions
5 August 202243 Pages -
20 May 202231 Pages
-
11 November 202164 Pages
Related publications
-
15 September 202599 Pages -
10 December 202250 Pages
-
Working paper
A historical perspective and stocktaking
20 January 202159 Pages -
24 February 202092 Pages -
Working paper
The cases of the Convention on Long‑Range Transboundary Air Pollution, the Canada‑United States Air Quality Agreement, and co‑operation in North East Asia
24 January 202074 Pages