In 2017, the “Sláintecare Report” proposed a comprehensive overhaul of the Irish health system including a reform proposal to phase out private practice in public hospitals to end the unequal treatment of public and private patients – private patients typically have quicker access to care – and reduce waiting times for public patients. This paper summarises the arguments for and against this practice that were put forward to help inform the subsequent policy debate. The paper compares how private practice is regulated and organised in Ireland with the situation in four other OECD countries – Australia, France, Israel and the United Kingdom - and discusses the costs and benefits of private practice in public hospitals, and highlights potential consequences of a ban on this practice. It also describes the information required when making a decision whether to ban this practice or not. Finally, the paper discusses some alternative policy approaches that could replace or complement a ban of private practice to discontinue the unequal treatment of public and private patients.
Reassessing private practice in public hospitals in Ireland
An overview of OECD experiences
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
A review of gatekeeping and cost‑sharing policies across the OECD
29 May 202662 Pages -
Working paper21 May 202638 Pages
-
10 April 202641 Pages
-
Working paper
Balancing resilience and sustainability in challenging times
31 March 202634 Pages -
Working paper
Lessons for Slovenia
22 January 202672 Pages -
Working paper16 January 202699 Pages
-
Working paper
An analysis of emergency department visits and hospitalisation data from 16 countries
17 December 202555 Pages
Related publications
-
15 April 2026