Decentralising health services – the transfer of power and responsibility from the central to the local level – should help the poor if local resources, accountability and governance are in good shape. The process in China and India had negative effects because local governments remained under-funded and health was not seen as their priority. Contrary to this, decentralisation in Indonesia and the Philippines produced better health outcomes because they reformed healthcare funding. This is key to successful pro-poor decentralisation.
Decentralisation in Asian Health Sectors
Friend or Foe?
Policy paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
1 May 20122 Pages
-
1 September 20112 Pages
-
1 June 20112 Pages
-
1 November 20102 Pages
-
1 November 20102 Pages
-
1 November 20102 Pages
-
1 February 20092 Pages
-
Policy paper1 February 20092 Pages
Related publications
-
22 March 202449 Pages
-
18 March 2024200 Pages