This report proposes a taxonomy of policy design features for agri-environmental payment schemes, with a focus on those features that are conducive to policy cost-effectiveness. An application of the taxonomy to all agri-environmental payment schemes in six countries (Argentina, Australia, Estonia, Finland, Korea, and Portugal) reveals that more than 70% of 85 agri-environmental payment schemes have some of these key design features, including establishment of baselines; rates based on estimated or actual implementation costs; inspections and penalties; contract flexibility; and technical assistance. That said, at least 80% of the schemes could be improved, including by: use of cost-effectiveness criteria for selecting recipients; moving from supporting the adoption of specific practices to focusing on achievement of environmental outcomes; more regular policy evaluations; and comprehensive collection of information on policy characteristics. An in-depth application of the taxonomy to Korea illustrates the potential of this taxonomy for country policy monitoring and evaluation purposes.
Characterising agri‑environmental policies
Towards measuring their progress
Policy paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
15 June 202656 Pages
-
3 June 202620 Pages
-
17 February 202673 Pages
-
Working paper
Economic analysis, literature findings and synthesis
28 May 202590 Pages -
Working paper
Impacts on the triple challenge and cost‑benefits analysis
22 May 202527 Pages -
Working paper
A literature review on policy effectiveness
9 May 202547 Pages -
Working paper
Case study of the Australian beef and wheat sectors
2 April 202580 Pages
Related publications
-
15 June 202656 Pages
-
Report
Framework, indicator methodology and results
29 October 202575 Pages -
Working paper
Reinforcing global food markets
1 August 202549 Pages