This paper reviews and compares five case studies on quantification and economic valuation of benefits in cost-benefit analyses (CBAs) of regulating phthalates, mercury, PFOA (perfluoro-octanic acid) and its salts, NMP (1 methyl-2-pyrroloidine) and formaldehyde. The case studies had all been carried out as part of the SACAME project, and the purpose of the present paper is to draw out cross-cutting findings from these studies.
Assessing the economic valuation of the benefits of regulating chemicals
Lessons learned from five case studies
Working paper
OECD Environment Working Papers
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
Related publications
-
12 September 2024