This paper provides a concrete example of how policy analysts can use empirical programme evaluation studies to perform ex-post assessments of environmentally related tax policies. A number of studies credibly identify causal effects of environmentally related tax policies, but do not necessarily provide all the information needed to fully inform the policy-making process. This paper argues that cost-benefit analysis (CBA) could enrich ex-post assessments of environmentally related tax policies, given that CBA provides decision makers with a broader perspective of social costs and benefits and allows the identification of potential trade-offs among policy objectives.
Are environmental tax policies beneficial?
Learning from programme evaluation studies
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
26 May 202654 Pages
-
Working paper
A large‑scale multi‑country stated preference approach
20 May 202669 Pages -
Working paper
The role of innovation across the supply chain
27 April 202675 Pages -
Working paper
A large‑scale multi‑country stated preference approach
7 April 202675 Pages -
Working paper
A large‑scale multi‑country stated preference approach
7 April 202671 Pages -
Working paper
A large‑scale multi‑country stated preference approach
7 April 202673 Pages -
27 January 202644 Pages
-
Working paper
Lessons from international case studies and toolkit for policymakers
9 January 202677 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
Insights from a decomposition analysis for the OECD and the world
11 December 202530 Pages -
Report
Framework, indicator methodology and results
29 October 202575 Pages