Controlled foreign company (CFC) rules respond to the risk that taxpayers can strip the tax base of their country of residence and by shifting income into a foreign company that is controlled by the taxpayers. Without such rules, CFCs provide opportunities for profit shifting and long-term deferral of taxation.
Since the first CFC rules were enacted in 1962, an increasing number of jurisdictions have implemented these rules. However, existing CFC rules have often not kept pace with changes in the international business environment, and many of them have design features that do not tackle base erosion and profit shifting risks effectively.
In response to the challenges faced by existing CFC rules, the BEPS Action Plan called for the development of recommendations regarding the design of CFC rules. The OECD 2015 Action 3 report set out recommendations in the form of building blocks for the design of effective CFC rules, which include the definition of a CFC, exemptions and thresholds, approaches for determining the type of income subject to the rule, computation of CFC income, the attribution of CFC income to shareholders and measures to eliminate the risk of double taxation. These recommendations are not minimum standards, but are designed to ensure that jurisdictions that choose to implement them will have rules that effectively prevent taxpayers from inappropriately shifting income into foreign subsidiaries.
As at mid-2019, almost 50 OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework countries have now enacted CFC rules, with EU Member States all having CFC rules in effect since the beginning of 2019 following the adoption of Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164, with a number of additional countries considering the adoption of CFC rules for the first time.