In the history of adjustment, concern with the political aspects appeared only after long reflection. At the beginning of the 1980s, given the urgency of the financial crises afflicting many developing countries, the only thought was to restore macroeconomic balances, particularly the balance of payments, by means of short-term measures — budget cuts and tight monetary policy — and through devaluation. Adjustment was limited to a stabilization programme, the sole criterion being the reduction of the external deficit as rapidly as possible. It was soon realised, however, that stabilization is not an end in itself: reducing demand is not enough; it is also necessary to increase supply by improving resource allocation. Under the goading of the international organisations, stabilization measures were therefore supplemented by structural adjustment measures, such as reducing customs duties, deregulating financial markets and eliminating distortions in agricultural prices. This distinction between stabilization and structural adjustment is important from the political standpoint. In fact, a stabilization programme is a kind of emergency treatment....
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
11 September 200822 Pages
-
23 July 200840 Pages
-
11 March 200828 Pages
-
1 December 200736 Pages
Related publications
-
15 September 2026212 Pages -
Working paper
How transport modes, proximity and capacity shape accessibility across cities, towns and rural areas
30 June 202653 Pages -
Policy paper22 June 202627 Pages