Tables of national competitiveness give an easily comparable ranking of the winners and losers of global economic competition. But they don't explain why the “poor” countries are four times less productive than the “rich” ones or why some rich countries are twice as productive as others. Using empirical data from over 50 countries, this book shows how even small differences in a number of factors combine to boost or block productivity. Governments need such information to set priorities. Investors need it too, and two new rankings are proposed as alternatives to a simple comparison of industrial productivity. The first, called the “investor ranking”, is based on infrastructure, human capital and total factor productivity. The second, “exporter ranking”, is for investors whose prime concern is for a production platform well-integrated into world trade. Combining the new rankings with a more traditional one produces three groups of countries, termed balanced, high potential, and vulnerable. Group membership reserves some surprises: you may be rich, but that doesn’t mean you’re not vulnerable.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
11 March 2024125 Pages
-
2 December 2021102 Pages
-
24 April 201999 Pages
-
16 November 201788 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
How transport modes, proximity and capacity shape accessibility across cities, towns and rural areas
30 June 202653 Pages -
Policy paper22 June 202627 Pages
-
7 January 20268 Pages
-
18 December 202571 Pages