In drawing lessons from experience in the United Kingdom, it is useful to firstly examine some of the overall differences between the UK and Finland, both in respect of aggregate statistics and structure of the public transport system. The following statistics indicate the main comparisons. In many respects the main indicators are very similar (GDP in PPP terms, overall modal split, car ownership levels), with the very striking difference in population density, that for Finland being less than one tenth of the UK figure. In these circumstances it is not surprising that car ownership per head is somewhat higher (by 18.2%), and likewise total distance travelled per person (by 17.6%). An implication of these contrasts is that even areas regarded as ‘low density’ within the UK might not be classified as ‘low density’ by Finnish standards, and this may affect transferability of results.
Report on Public Transport Provision in Rural and Depopulated Areas in the United Kingdom
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
18 March 202123 Pages
-
17 March 202124 Pages
-
Working paper
Mobility as a Service from the User and Service Design Perspectives
28 January 202128 Pages -
Working paper27 January 202130 Pages
-
27 January 202120 Pages
-
Working paper
Principles, Issues and Policy Recommendations
27 January 202120 Pages
Related publications
-
Policy paper
The case of the Trans‑Caspian Transport Corridor
3 February 202648 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from a decomposition analysis for the OECD and the world
11 December 202530 Pages -
24 November 2025197 Pages -
5 August 202528 Pages