One of the key objectives of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is to instigate design for the environment. In collective EPR schemes, the fee schedule set by Producer Responsibility Organisations (PROs) is typically quite simple and provides weak incentives for design change by producers. Fee modulation, changing fees paid by producers in a collective EPR scheme based on product design, can provide producers with stronger design incentives, but adds complexity to the system. The paper defines a classification for fee modulation (by criteria and methodology) and discusses potential challenges and opportunities. It concludes with key policy insights that can further stimulate this emerging policy approach.
Modulated fees for Extended Producer Responsibility schemes (EPR)
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
The role of innovation across the supply chain
27 April 202675 Pages -
Working paper
A large‑scale multi‑country stated preference approach
7 April 202675 Pages -
Working paper
A large‑scale multi‑country stated preference approach
7 April 202671 Pages -
Working paper
A large‑scale multi‑country stated preference approach
7 April 202673 Pages -
27 January 202644 Pages
-
Working paper
Lessons from international case studies and toolkit for policymakers
9 January 202677 Pages -
Working paper
A literature review
22 December 202566 Pages -
Working paper
Harnessing blended finance to scale investments in emerging markets and developing economies
6 November 2025103 Pages
Related publications
-
14 February 202546 Pages
-
Working paper11 December 202444 Pages
-
Working paper22 October 202488 Pages
-
17 April 202419 Pages
-
9 November 202371 Pages
-
Working paper19 December 202258 Pages
-
23 January 201958 Pages
-
20 September 2016292 Pages