This paper looks at different experiences in the development and use of societal progress indicator sets – at the European, national and sub-national level – with the aim of identifying useful lessons from these experiences. Five case studies are presented: the indicators used to support the EU ?Lisbon Strategy?; the UK Sustainable Development indicators; Measures of Australia?s Progress; Measuring Ireland?s Progress; and an example of a local community indicator initiative – the Santa Cruz Community Assessment Programme, in California. The paper concludes that for societal progress indicators to be used and applied in decision-making processes, then three conditions need to be met. First, the indicators should be seen as legitimate by the intended users. Second, the indicators should be set within a wider system that provides =fit-for-purpose‘ information. Third, an appropriate incentive structure must be in place for stakeholders to act on that information.
Indicators of “Societal Progress”
Lessons from International Experiences
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
23 March 202623 Pages
-
Working paper
Methodology and results from the 2025 experimental data collection
23 December 202573 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from a decomposition analysis for the OECD and the world
11 December 202530 Pages -
Working paper
Do different methods for measuring non‑market output affect international comparability?
2 April 202548 Pages -
10 March 202545 Pages
-
5 September 202435 Pages
-
Working paper
Sensitivity testing and results for productivity analysis
6 August 202463 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
Implications for forward‑looking policy design
24 April 202665 Pages -
Report
Building policy coherence for sustainable development
27 February 202672 Pages -
Policy brief
Insights from a few countries worldwide
4 December 202512 Pages -
4 December 202512 Pages
-
Working paper
Updated evidence to inform national data collections
25 June 202573 Pages