The experience of newly-industrialised countries suggests the need for an analysis in which the pattern of comparative advantage is not set in stone but is potentially flexible, and in which less developed countries can develop and converge in both income and economic structure to industrial economies. The pattern of trade and development in the world economy clearly shows the key role played by history: cumulative causation has created concentrations of industrial activity in particular locations and left other areas more dependent on primary activities. By changing the attractiveness of countries as a base for manufacturing production, trading arrangements can potentially trigger or postpone industrial development. At the same time, cut-throat bidding war to attract FDI may have unintended negative consequences on recipient countries if they lead governments to offer excessive fiscal and financial subsidies and to disregard the protection of the investment and of workers’ rights ...
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
Evidence on data availability and quality in 18 countries
28 May 202640 Pages -
13 November 202556 Pages
-
Working paper
Reinforcing global food markets
1 August 202549 Pages -
27 June 202536 Pages
-
Working paper
Methodology and the example of the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake
27 June 202537 Pages -
27 June 202536 Pages
-
24 April 202554 Pages
-
Working paper
Historical perspectives from the 1850s‑1930s
17 April 202550 Pages