It has always been a controversial tool, generating accusations of unacceptable principle, improper application, inadequate evidence base and bias. One early application was to the appraisal of the proposed third London Airport where a critic labelled the project appraisal as “nonsense on stilts” and the method was defended against accusations of being “bastard science and/or insidious poison in the body politick” (Self 1970, Williams, 1973). Since that time, appraisal has found itself at the centre of public disputes about the road planning system, the treatment of environmental impacts, the socalled “roads generate traffic” issue and the relationship between transport and the economy. The…
Cost‑Benefit Analysis in Transport
A UK Perspective
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
1 November 201036 Pages
-
1 November 201039 Pages
-
1 November 201020 Pages
-
Working paper
The Regulator's Role in the Policy Process, Including Issues of Regulatory Independence
1 November 201024 Pages -
1 November 201022 Pages
-
1 November 201018 Pages
Related publications
-
15 April 2026