How can we better understand, measure and maximise the impact of knowledge co-production between education practitioners and researchers? OECD's Evidence Web for Education (EWE), ULF and the Swedish National Agency for Education are bringing together researchers, practitioners, policymakers and knowledge intermediaries from 12 education systems, for an international conference. We will discuss different models of knowledge co-production, the types of impact co-production can achieve, and through what mechanisms, and how impact can be identified, understood and evaluated, how co-produced knowledge can contribute to system improvement. Through international examples, interactive discussions and expert input, the conference aims to generate practical insights, build capacity and foster international learning on evidence-informed education.
Knowledge co-production between practitioners and researchers and its impact
- Date
- 2 November 2026
- Time
- 9:00-18:00
- Location
- Stockholm, Sweden and Online
If you don’t yet have access, click here to register.
Agenda
Researchers, practitioners and policymakers from 12 education systems will share experiences and practical insights on understanding, evaluating and enhancing the impact of knowledge co-production.
- Christina Månberg, Skolverket (Swedish National Agency for Education)
- Sebastian Björnhammer, ULF (Education, Learning, Research)
- Niclas Westin, City of Stockholm; ULF Capital Node’s Management Group; ULF National Steering Committee
- Nóra Révai, Evidence Web for Education, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD
- William Penuel, University of Colorado-Boulder, United States
- The ULF model: history and structure
- Sebastian Björnhammer, ULF (Education, Learning, Research)
- Elisabet Nihlfors, Uppsala University
• The NPP: context and guiding principle
- Laila Guvå, Skolverket (Swedish National Agency for Education)
- Stakeholder Perspectives: Strengths, challenges and impact - Panel discussion and Q&A
- Lisbeth Gyllander Torkildsen, ULF southern node management group & national steering board; VALS (scientific leaders in education network); Head of Quality and Development at the City of Malmö
- Ola J. Lindberg, Umeå University; ULF north node management group
- Christina Månberg, Skolverket (Swedish National Agency for Education)
- Tine Sophie Prøitz, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway
- Robin Smith, Sveriges Lärare, the Swedish teachers’ union
- Moderated by Tali Malkin, OECD
Session 1: Collaborative learning and development: forms of knowledge, agency and participation in co-production
How can different forms of knowledge be brought together on a genuinely equal footing, and what enables collaborative learning to thrive?
- Leerpunt, Flanders-Belgium - Isabelle Janssens & Emmelien Merchie
- Hiroshima University, Japan - Hiromi Kawaguchi
- University of Stavanger, Norway - Oddny Judith Solheim
- Discussion moderated by Simon Sjölund, Mälardalen University, Sweden
Session 2: Collaborative learning and development: turning co-production into changes in practice
How does knowledge co-production build capacity and produce change in practice and organisations?
- University of Calgary, Alberta-Canada - Sharon Friesen & Barbara Brown
- DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Germany - Désirée Theis
- NAFA - The Danish Science Education Academy, Denmark - Martin Krabbe Sillasen & Mette Hesselholt Henne Hansen
- Discussion moderated by Amy Faux, the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF), UK
Sweden is halfway through a twenty-year ambition to build a national ecosystem for knowledge coproduction between education and research. Drawing on the development of ULF and the emerging NPP, this keynote reflects on what it takes to move from mobilisation and local partnerships towards sustainable system capacity. It explores the complementary strengths and limitations of bottom-up and top-down approaches, and argues that neither is sufficient on its own. A mature ecosystem requires governance, resources, quality mechanisms, professional pathways and a culture of mutual respect, alongside infrastructures that enable knowledge, competence and agency to circulate, accumulate and create value across the system.
- Åke Ingerman, Örebro University, Sweden
How can networks, intermediaries and system-level infrastructure coordinate co-production across organisations, enabling impact to spread beyond individual partnerships, while maintaining quality, contextual relevance and shared ownership?
- Education Endowment Foundation (EEF), England, UK - Amy Faux & Jack Mollart-Solity
- Ontwikkelkracht, Netherlands - Margot Schel
- National Network of Education Research-Practice Partnerships (NNERPP), United States - Paula Arce-Trigatti
- Discussion moderated by Eleanor MacKillop, Wales Centre for Public Policy, Cardiff University, UK
How can evaluation capture not only whether change occurred, but how partnership processes, organisational conditions and implementation pathways contributed to it?
- EduCaixa, Spain - Marta García-Matos & Nicholas Wright
- Tallinn University, Estonia - Eve Eisenschmidt & Kätlin Vanari
- Discussion moderated by Inge de Wolf, Maastricht University, Netherlands
- OECD-EWE’s support for impact development
- Expert panel discussion
- Maria Andrée, Stockholm University; ULF capital region node’s management group;
- Stockholm Teaching and Learning Studies
- William Penuel, University of Colorado-Boulder, United States
- Tine Sophie Prøitz, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway
- Makito Yurita, National Institute for School Teachers and Staff Development, Japan
- Moderated by Nóra Révai, OECD
Related content
-
33 PagesHow can quality assurance agencies become active drivers of evidence-informed policy and practice? Drawing on new data from the OECD’s 2023 Survey of Knowledge Mobilisation in Education and international research, this paper offers considerations and inspiring examples on how to strengthen the role of quality assurance agencies in knowledge mobilisation.Learn more
-
25 PagesHow can research and initial teacher education institutions become active drivers of evidence-informed policy and practice? Drawing on new data from the OECD’s 2023 Survey of Knowledge Mobilisation and international research, this paper offers considerations and inspiring examples on how to strengthen the role of research and initial teacher education institutions in knowledge mobilisation.Learn more
-
To keep education responsive, effective and equitable in a rapidly changing world, policy makers and practitioners need timely access to high-quality, relevant evidence. Yet across OECD countries, the uptake and effective use of research in education policy and practice remains limited – and when it is used, its application can be poor.Learn more
-
170 PagesBuilding on the insights of the first two publications in the Strengthening the Impact of Education Research series, this third and final report shifts the focus from policy makers to the field, exploring the pivotal role of knowledge intermediaries. These organisations facilitate engagement with research among policy makers and practitioners, supporting evidence-informed decision making and practices in education. Drawing on new data from 288 such organisations across 34 countries, the report delves into the ways these intermediaries bridge the gap between education research, policy and practice. It highlights their efforts to disseminate evidence, foster collaboration, and build capacity for research use, while also identifying gaps in skills and infrastructure that demonstrate the need for further professionalisation of knowledge mobilisation. By offering actionable insights for policy makers, practitioners, researchers and intermediaries, this report emphasises the importance of co-ordination, evaluative thinking, and system-level strategies to maximise the impact of education research. It serves as a valuable resource for those seeking to understand and enhance the landscape of knowledge mobilisation, ensuring that education systems are better equipped to integrate evidence into policy and practice.Learn more
-
60 PagesOver the past two decades, the use of research in educational practice has emerged as a policy imperative in many OECD countries. However, concerns about the significant gap between research evidence and practice are persistent. This working paper delves into the role of research-practice partnerships in bridging this divide. It critically evaluates common assumptions associated with such partnerships through an overview of research, insights from recent OECD data, and importantly, through in-depth case studies. These illustrate partnerships between education researchers and school practitioners in three countries: Norway, the United States, and Germany. They examine the conditions under which these can achieve an impact on both research and practice, and illuminate challenges and open questions associated with these collaborations. The paper aims to inform policy makers and researchers alike on the potential and limitations of research-practice partnerships.Learn more
-
The Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI) provides and promotes international comparative research, innovation and key indicators, explores forward-looking and innovative approaches to education and learning, and facilitates bridges between educational research, innovation and policy development.Learn more
-
42 PagesEngaging with research, and ensuring research evidence is used well, is key to professionalising education policy making processes, and ultimately to improving educational outcomes. But the systematic use of evidence in policy making faces many challenges.This policy brief draws on evidence from the OECD Strengthening the Impact of Education Research project’s country learning seminars, as well as the project’s policy survey that collected responses from ministries of education in 37 education systems from 29 countries. The project is based in the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). This brief presents a set of case studies on two questions:• What human resource strategies can build individual and collective civil service professionalism?• What stable structures and mechanisms can contribute to the systematic and thoughtful use of evidence in policy processes?Learn more