The level of education of the population gives an indication of its stock and quality of human resources. A higher stock and quality of human resources may mean higher labour productivity and hence a higher income‑generating capacity. The average number of years spent in education among the working-age population is the most readily available and cross-nationally comparable measure of educational attainment across the Asia/Pacific region.
The United Nation Sustainable Development Goal 4.1 aims to ensure all girls and boys complete free, equitable and quality primary and secondary education (12 years) leading to relevant and effective outcomes by 2030. However, on average, the population over 25 years of age in Asia/Pacific economies has been in education for roughly 9.5 years with large cross-national differences (Figure 4.9). The population over 25 in Australia, Georgia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Hong Kong (China) and New Zealand spent more years in education than the OECD average (12 years), while in Nepal and Pakistan, the number of years spent in education is below five years on average. There is a gender gap in educational attainment in Asia/Pacific economies in favour of men. In 2022, men over 25 in Asia/Pacific economies spent on average 0.3 years more in education than women: this gender gap in mean years of schooling is significantly wider in India (1.06 years) and Nepal (1.2 years).
Trends since 2005 suggest that the average years of schooling of those aged 25 and over increased across both OECD and Asia/Pacific economies (Figure 4.10). Notably, Bhutan, the Maldives and Malaysia are rapidly increasing the average level of educational attainment. Over the 2005‑22 period, many countries including Lao PDR, Mongolia and Pakistan – have been closing the gender gap in mean years of schooling.
Students from Singapore and large Chinese cities outscored students from OECD countries in reading, science, and mathematics competency tests of the 2022 OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) (Figure 4.11). Other countries, such as Cambodia, the Philippines and Uzbekistan, scored well below the OECD average across the three subjects.
