In most PISA-participating countries and economies, the average socio-economic background of students who attend privately managed schools is more advantaged than that of those who attend public schools. Yet in some countries, there is little difference in the socio-economic profiles between public and private schools. Why? An analysis of PISA results finds that while the prevalence of privately managed schools in a country is not related to socio-economic stratification within a school system, the level of public funding to privately managed schools is: the higher the proportion of public funding allocated to privately managed schools, the smaller the socio-economic divide between publicly and privately managed schools. This report also shows that those countries with narrow socio-economic stratification in their education systems not only maximise equity and social cohesion, but also perform well in the PISA survey.
Public and Private Schools
How Management and Funding Relate to their Socio-economic Profile
Report
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Report1 March 2024545 Pages
Related publications
-
24 February 20268 Pages
-
17 June 2025119 Pages
-
17 June 202579 Pages
-
Working paper
Exploring educational outcomes and equity gaps using international surveys
16 January 202574 Pages