[32] Ahmadzadeh Nobari Azar et al (2024), Detecting emotions through EEG signals based on modified convolutional fuzzy neural network, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-60977-9 (accessed on 13 February 2026).
[8] American Medical Association (2024), Augmented Intelligence in Health Care (policy defining neural data), https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/augmented-intelligence-health-care-policy (accessed on 15 May 2026).
[2] Centre for Future Generations (2025), Neurotech Market Atlas, https://cfg.eu/neurotech-market-atlas/ (accessed on 11 February 2026).
[15] Council of Europe (2024), Expert report on the privacy and data protection implication of the use of neurotechnology and neural data from the perspective of Convention 108+, https://www.coe.int/en/web/data-protection/-/the-privacy-and-data-protection-implication-of-the-use-of-neurotechnology-and-neural-data-from-the-perspective-of-convention-108.
[4] Council of Europe (2021), Neurotechnologies and Human Rights Framework: Do we need new rights?, https://rm.coe.int/round-table-report-en/1680a969ed.
[14] Council of Europe (2020), Strategic Plan on Human Rights and Technologies in Biomedicine (2020-2025), https://rm.coe.int/strategic-action-plan-final-e/1680a2c5d2.
[26] EPRS (2024), The protection of mental privacy in the area of neuroscience, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2024/757807/EPRS_STU(2024)757807_EN.pdf.
[7] European Data Protection Supervisor (2024), TechDispatch #1/2024 – Neurodata., https://www.edps.europa.eu/data-protection/our-work/publications/techdispatch/2024-06-03-techdispatch-12024-neurodata_en (accessed on 13 February 2026).
[22] FDA (2021), Regulatory Overview for Neurological Devices, https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/neurological-devices/regulatory-overview-neurological-devices.
[25] GPA (2024), 46th Closed Session of the Global Privacy Assembly; Adopted Resolution on the GPA Rules & Procedures, https://www.edps.europa.eu/system/files/2024-11/resolution-on-the-gpa-rules-procedures_en.pdf.
[24] ICO (2024), ICO tech futures: neurotechnology, https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/research-reports-impact-and-evaluation/research-and-reports/technology-and-innovation/tech-horizons-and-ico-tech-futures/ico-tech-futures-neurotechnology/.
[3] ICO, U. (2023), ICO Tech Futures: Neurotechnolgy, https://ico.org.uk/media2/about-the-ico/research-and-reports/ico-tech-futures-neurotechnology-0-1.pdf.
[33] Ienca and Malgieri (2022), “Mental data protection and the GDPR”, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Vol. 9/1, https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/9/1/lsac006/6564354.
[6] Ienca, M. et al. (2022), “Towards a Governance Framework for Brain Data”, Neuroethics, Vol. 15/2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09498-8.
[16] International Bioethics Committee (2022), Ethical issues of neurotechnology: report, adopted in December 2021, https://doi.org/10.54678/QNKB6229.
[23] Légifrance (2021), “LOI n° 2021-1017 du 2 août 2021 relative à la bioéthique”, Journal officiel de la République française,, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/dossierlegislatif/JORFDOLE000038811571/ (accessed on 17 February 2026).
[9] Liu, Y. et al. (2022), “Decoding cognition from spontaneous neural activity”, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 23/4, pp. 204-214, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00570-z.
[34] Martone, M. (2024), “The past, present and future of neuroscience data sharing: a perspective on the state of practices and infrastructure for FAIR”, Frontier Neuroinformatics, https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2023.1276407.
[31] Meng et al (2024), “Protecting Multiple Types of Privacy Simultaneously in EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces”, arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19498.
[37] OECD (2025), Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/enhancing-access-to-and-sharing-of-data-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence_23a70dca-en.html.
[13] OECD (2025), Neurotechnology Toolkit T osupport policymakers in implementing the OECD Recommendation on Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/topics/policy-sub-issues/emerging-technologies/neurotech-toolkit.pdf.
[11] OECD (2025), OECD Economic Outlook: Resilient Growth but with Increasing Fragilities, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2025/12/oecd-economic-outlook-volume-2025-issue-2_413f7d0a/9f653ca1-en.pdf.
[38] OECD (2025), Regulatory Sandbox Toolkit, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2025/06/regulatory-sandbox-toolkit_cc8d3e50/de36fa62-en.pdf.
[39] OECD (2024), Regulatory Experimentation: Moving ahead on the Agile Regulatory Governance Agenda, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/04/regulatory-experimentation_fc84553c/f193910c-en.pdf.
[27] OECD (2023), Emerging privacy-enhancing technologies: Current regulatory and policy approaches, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/emerging-privacy-enhancing-technologies_bf121be4-en.html.
[36] OECD (2021), OECD Recommendation on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data, https://www.oecd.org/en/toolkits/access-to-research-data-from-public-funding-toolkit.html.
[30] OECD (2019), Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data Reconciling Risks and Benefits from Data Re-Use across Societies, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2019/11/enhancing-access-to-and-sharing-of-data_070835df/276aaca8-en.pdf.
[1] OECD (2019), Recommendation of the Council on Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0457.
[12] OECD (1980), Recommendation of the Council concerning Guidelines Governing the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0188.
[20] Rainey, E. (2020), “Is the European Data Protection Regulation sufficient to deal with emerging data concerns relating to neurotechnology?”, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/7/1/lsaa051/5864051.
[35] Regulatory Horizons Council (2022), Neurotechnology regulation, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63e9e8f88fa8f5050ee37d10/rhc-neurotechnology-regulation.pdf (accessed on 13 February 2026).
[28] Regulatory Horizons Council (2022), Neurotechnology taxonomy, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63872f02e90e0778a67f8058/RHC_Neurotechnology_Taxonomy.pdf (accessed on 19 February 2026).
[29] Robinson, J. et al. (2024), “An application-based taxonomy for brain–computer interfaces”, Nature Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 9/6, pp. 789-791, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01326-z.
[10] Rübel, O. et al. (2022), “The Neurodata Without Borders ecosystem for neurophysiological data science”, eLife, Vol. 11, https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.78362.
[18] UN. Human Rights Council. Advisory Committee (2024), Impact, opportunities and challenges of neurotechnology with regard to the promotion and protection of all human rights, UN, https://doi.org/10.54678/pogs7778.
[17] UNESCO (2025), Recommendation on the ethics of neurotechnology, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000394866 (accessed on 19 February 2026).
[19] UNICEF (2024), Neurotechnology and Children, https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/reports/neurotechnology-and-children.
[5] Winickoff, D., L. Kreiling and L. Lennad (2024), “The Global Governance of Neurotechnology: The Need for an Ecosystem Approach”, AJOB Neuroscience, Vol. 15/2, pp. 116-118, https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2024.2326952.
[21] Yuste, R. (2023), “Advocating for neurodata privacy and neurotechnology regulation”, Springer Nature, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/s41596-023-00873-0?fromPaywallRec=false.