Development banks and DFIs differ in scope and geographic coverage (Figure A A.1), as well as ownership structures and business models, and accordingly have distinct strengths:
Multilateral development banks (MDBs) operate globally or regionally, including the African Development Bank (AfDB), Asian Development Bank (ADB), Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), European Investment Bank (EIB), Inter-American Development Bank (IDB Group, including IDB Invest) and World Bank Group (including IFC and MIGA), operate globally or regionally. Some MDBs include public and private sector arms, such as the World Bank Group with IFC and MIGA and the IDB Group with IDB Invest. MDBs are among the largest providers of development finance and mobilise the largest volumes of private finance. MDBs typically enjoy high credit ratings and strong balance sheets
Bilateral development banks are nationally mandated institutions, including Germany’s KfW Development Bank, Agence française de développement (AFD) and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). Bilateral development banks primarily support sovereign operations and focus on policy mandates.
Bilateral DFIs are private-sector-focused, including British International Investment (BII), FinDev Canada and the Impact Fund Denmark (IFDK). DFIs can be more risk-tolerant and are typically structured as commercially oriented institutions.
Regional and national development banks (NDBs) of developing countries include institutions such as DBSA, BNDES and TDB. National and regional development banks are often set up to deliver national development priorities, deeply embedded in domestic public and private sector contexts and able to provide finance in local currency.
For the complete list of institutions included in the report, refer to Table A A.1. The institutions were selected based on their relative size, availability of access to reliable data and their representativeness across different regions.