Social and emotional well-being in adolescence depends on adolescents’ capacity to cope with the disruptions of many physical, cognitive and psychosocial changes that characterise this developmental stage. Findings from the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills highlight important differences by sex that tend to widen with age. At age 15, boys report higher levels of emotional regulation – particularly stress resistance – as well as greater energy, trust, and sociability, with gaps in stress resistance already visible by age 10. In contrast, girls tend to report higher levels of tolerance, achievement motivation, empathy, and responsibility (OECD, 2024[30]).
At the same time, evidence suggests that adolescent girls may face particular stressors and barriers to developing the skills needed to navigate these challenges. Personal skills such as high levels of self-efficacy, a growth mindset, perseverance, and stress-resistance enhance adolescents’ resilience and can lessen the likeliness of negative outcomes such as mental health issues (Tang, Upadyaya and Salmela‐Aro, 2020[31]; Bae, Zhang and Lee, 2024[32]). These individual features are particularly important due to the many stressors met in adolescence, such as interpersonal difficulties and academic pressure, which have a significant impact on social and emotional well-being. Additional stressors are increasingly highlighted, such as the growing role of digital environments – associated with a diverse range of negative experiences – as well as concerns about climate change and global conflicts (OECD, 2026[3]). While these factors are frequently cited by clinicians and policymakers, further research is needed to better understand the extent to which they shape adolescents’ social and emotional well-being.
In most OECD countries, adolescent girls report lower levels of resilience and are more likely to report high levels of perceived stress than boys. Both factors can indicate a higher vulnerability to poor mental well-being in adolescence.
Adolescent girls are less likely to report high levels of self-efficacy, i.e. to have high confidence in their capacity to exercise control over important things in their lives. For example, on average across the OECD, 53% of 11‑, 13‑ and 15‑year‑old girls report managing to do the things they decide to do most of the time, compared to 62% of boys. This difference is statistically significant in all 27 OECD countries with available data, except Spain. Similarly, 57% of girls and 66% of boys across the OECD state that they find a solution to a problem if they try hard enough most of the time. Only in Israel and Spain is the pattern not statistically significant.
Additionally, girls are less likely to report aspects of resilience such as a growth mindset (the belief that an individual’s abilities are not innate but can be improved through effort, learning, persistence and perseverance) (Walker and Jiang, 2022[33]; Gouëdard, 2021[34]; Jiang, Fang and Mueller, 2023[35]). On average across the OECD, 20% of 15‑year‑old girls present high relative levels of a growth mindset compared to 24% of boys at the same age. Perseverance (e.g. remaining interested in a started task, not giving up easily when confronted with a problem) is also less high in 15‑year‑old girls than in their male peers (OECD averages of 21% and 24%, respectively). This pattern is statistically significant in most OECD countries.
Finally, adolescent girls report high stress resistance less often than boys (Figure 5). While 39% of 15‑year‑old boys across the OECD report high values on the PISA Index “Stress-Resistance”, only 14% of girls do. The index is derived from adolescents’ agreement with statements such as “I panic easily” or “I can recover quickly after something bad has happened”. When asked questions about their ability to navigate life and cope with their personal problems recently, over half of 13‑ and 15‑year‑old girls (55%) indicate high levels of perceived stress, whereas for boys the share lies at 35% (see Figure A.9 in the additional data that can be found clicking on the Support materials tab of the paper at this link: https://doi.org/10.1787/00ebd3dd-en).