Discussions during the peer-learning event emphasised that achieving equitable and effective digital education systems requires addressing interconnected challenges of infrastructure, teacher preparedness, and resource quality through system level policies. According to the framework of the OECD project Resourcing School Education: Policies for the Digital Transformation of Education and Future-Readiness of Teachers (OECD, 2025[32]), considering these elements is fundamental to address barriers such as disparities in access to quality digital infrastructure, lack of necessary skills for the pedagogical use of digital resources in and out of the classroom, assessment of digital resources, and sustainable financing among others. Doing so through a systemic policy approach can ensure coherence across policy areas, hence establishing a comprehensive and integrated policy environment that enables effective uses of digital resources.
As highlighted at the start of the event, teacher professional learning remains a critical enabler of educational success. However, only 43% of educators in OECD countries report confidence in using digital tools pedagogically, despite widespread technical training (OECD, 2023[11]). To address this gap, some accredited professional development programmes have focused on AI-driven lesson differentiation and digital assessment literacy. These programmes demonstrate the value of grounding training in the Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge (TPACK) model, which integrates technological, pedagogical, and subject-specific expertise (Koehler, 2013[33]). This approach aligns with broader OECD recommendations for competency frameworks that prioritise continuous, practice-oriented learning ecosystems – such as peer coaching networks and micro-credentialling systems tied to career progression – over one-off workshops (OECD, 2023[11]).
Further, fostering student self-direction requires deliberate policy architectures rather than assuming innate digital competence. To this end, systemic models that embed self-regulated learning objectives into curriculum standards show promise, particularly when supported by learning analytics dashboards that provide real-time feedback. Evaluations of such approaches point to measurable improvements in problem-solving competencies (OECD, 2023[27]). Nonetheless, the OECD stresses the need for parallel investments in teacher training to interpret analytics effectively (2023[27]).
Underpinning all these elements are governance frameworks that coordinate cross-sector priorities. An example of the needed systemic coordination would be coupling inter-ministerial collaborations that align infrastructure investments and pedagogical goals with procurement standards that ensure edtech accessibility and data ethics. As highlighted in the OECD’s Shaping Digital Education: Enabling Factors for Quality, Equity and Efficiency report (2023[11]), if monitoring focuses on classroom integration rather than only on device distribution metrics, such architectures might transform the usage of digital tools from isolated interventions into drivers of pedagogical renewal.