Industrial subsidies and levelling the playing field

How is the OECD supporting a more level playing field?

While subsidies can be helpful policy tools for addressing emergencies or market failures - where other instruments are less effective or appropriate - they can also distort trade and competition depending on their design and target. Much like doping in sports, government support can give some firms a leg-up on their competitors that is not grounded in economic or market forces, but instead in the generosity of the government supporting them. This undermines fair competition and the willingness of economies to accept the results of that competition. Support may in turn push other countries to respond in kind, to the detriment of consumers, taxpayers, and other governments that do not have sufficient fiscal space, ultimately undermining public support for, and confidence in, an interconnected global economy.

Building on longstanding work measuring government support in agriculture, fossil fuels, and fisheries, the OECD has developed tools and methods for identifying and measuring subsidies in key industrial sectors. This work has used a novel firm-level approach to look into the support that governments provide to major industrial groups. The granular evidence thus obtained from subsidy recipients casts an unprecedented light on the various ways in which governments support manufacturers, including government grants, corporate tax concessions, debt and equity financing provided on below-market terms, and subsidised energy inputs. It highlights the important role that state enterprises can play as relatively large recipients of support but also as providers of support themselves, e.g. where state banks offer loans to companies at below-market rates.

The choice to rely on data collected at the level of individual firms is, importantly, one of necessity, reflecting the lack of government transparency that persists around public support. A key finding of OECD work on industrial subsidies is indeed that government information on these subsidies is generally poor. This hinders understanding of the scale, types, and effects of subsidies as well as efforts to revisit trade rules so they can better address government support.

Work at the OECD is ongoing to identify and quantify the use of industrial subsidies by governments. The OECD has already completed three sectoral studies looking at government support in key industrial sectors (aluminium, semiconductors, and rolling stock) and two studies focussing on specific support instruments (below-market finance and subsidised energy inputs). Work is also underway to capitalise on the firm-level data collected for these earlier studies in order to more systematically track government support across countries, sectors, years, and support instruments.



Latest update

Government Support in Industrial Sectors: A Synthesis Report

Industrial subsidies take on a growing importance in trade discussions. Yet assessing the scope and scale of government interventions in manufacturing remains notoriously difficult due to a persistent lack of reliable and comparable data. With many governments failing to provide sufficient information, attention has increasingly turned to firm-level data as a possible alternative for measuring industrial subsidies. Using this approach, recent OECD work has identified and quantified government support across key industrial sectors and policy instruments.


Policy brief

Level playing field publications

Access all OECD publications on level playing field on the OECD iLibrary. 

» Access publications

Access all trade publications

All of our trade research and analysis is available to read online for free on the OECD iLibrary

» Read more on trade

Sign-up for our trade newsletter

Sign-up to our newsletter to receive periodic e-mail updates on new publications, videos and analysis. 

» Sign-up

Contact us with your questions

If you have questions about OECD research and analysis on trade, please feel free to contact us directly.

» Contact us