[50] ACFE (2025), Fraud 101: What is Fraud?, https://www.acfe.com/fraud-resources/fraud-101-what-is-fraud (accessed on 24 October 2025).
[39] ACSH (2022), Open [Government] Data Policies and Practices: Select Country Cases, https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-03/20230317_Open%20Government%20Data_fin.fin_.pdf (accessed on 14 January 2026).
[186] Adam, I. and M. Fazekas (2018), “Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption in developing countries?”, Background Paper Series, No. 21, Pathways for Prosperity Commission, Oxford UK, https://pathwayscommission.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-09/are_emerging_technologies_helping_win_the_fight_against_corruption_in_developing_countries.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2023).
[91] Aldana, A., A. Falcón-Cortés and H. Larralde (2022), “A machine learning model to identify corruption in Mexico’s public procurement contracts”, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.01478.
[6] Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) (2024), Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, https://www.acfe.com/-/media/files/acfe/pdfs/rttn/2024/2024-report-to-the-nations.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2025).
[51] Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) (2025), Combatting fraud in a perfect storm, https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/ACCA_Global/professional-insights/combatting-fraud/PI-COMBATTING-FRAUD-FINAL.pdf (accessed on 22 November 2025).
[182] Australian Department of Home Affairs (2023), Defining Foreign Interference, https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about-us/our-portfolios/national-security/countering-foreign-interference/defining-foreign-interference (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[157] Australian Financial Review (2023), “Meet the mining lobby boss leading critical minerals charge”, https://www.afr.com/companies/mining/meet-the-mining-lobby-boss-leading-critical-minerals-charge-20230525-p5dba5 (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[92] Ayeboafo, B., S. Anomah and K. Amofah (2025), “Leveraging blockchain technology adoption in the fight against corruption: An evaluation of Ghana’s readiness”, Journal of Economic Criminology, Vol. 8, p. 100158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100158.
[132] Baum, A. et al. (2019), “Governance and State-Owned Enterprises: How Costly is Corruption?”, IMF Working Papers, Vol. 2019/253, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513519296.001.
[113] Benamouzig, D. and J. Cortinas Muñoz (2019), “Les stratégies politiques des entreprises en santé publique : le cas de l’agroalimentaire en France”, Revue française des affaires sociales 3, pp. 189-208, https://doi.org/10.3917/rfas.193.0189.
[159] Bloomberg (2023), “Copper’s Fight for Critical Mineral Status Gets Political Push”, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-01/copper-industry-gains-political-allies-in-fight-to-declare-metal-critical-to-us?embedded-checkout=true#xj4y7vzkg (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[87] Bozzay, E. et al. (2025), “Linking integrity, business conduct and public procurement: New approaches for sustainable supply chains”, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2025/01, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/cfb65ff8-en.
[96] Brå (2023), Vulnerability among elected officials (interim report): Unlawful influence by system-threatening actors, https://bra.se/rapporter/arkiv/2023-12-14-utsatthet-bland-fortroendevalda (accessed on 20 June 2025).
[104] Bressanelli, E. et al. (2020), Institutions and foreign interferences, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/655290/IPOL_STU(2020)655290_EN.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2023).
[123] Brezis, E. and J. Cariolle (2014), The Revolving Door Indicator: Estimating the distortionary power of the revolving door, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute.
[27] Business at OECD (2024), Comments by the Business at OECD (BIAC) Competition Committee to the OECD Competition Committee, https://www.businessatoecd.org/hubfs/website/documents/pdf/Competition/Competition%20and%20Democracy.pdf (accessed on 6 January 2026).
[167] Business at OECD (n.d.), Stepping up the game: Digital technologies for the promotion of the fight against corruption – a business perspective, https://25159535.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/25159535/website/documents/pdf/Anti-Corruption/FIN%20Anti-Corruption%20and%20Digital%20Technologies_BUSINESS%20AT%20OECD.pdf?hsCtaTracking=792ac73a-b51e-4d4f-905c-8995849b978b%7Cd9fd58bc-96e7-435a-b2c2-5feac6611147 (accessed on 28 February 2024).
[71] Cabinet Office (2025), Public Sector Fraud Authority: Fraud Risk Assessment Accelerator, https://www.gov.uk/algorithmic-transparency-records/public-sector-fraud-authority-fraud-risk-assessment-accelerator (accessed on 15 October 2025).
[185] Castro, A., N. Phillips and S. Ansari (2020), “Corporate Corruption: A Review and an Agenda for Future Research”, Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 14/2, pp. 935-968, https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0156.
[156] CBS News (2022), “New documents show top Trump officials disregarded concerns by State Dept. staff in relaxing sanctions on Israeli “Blood Diamond” magnate”, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dan-gertler-sanctions-trump-officials-israeli-businessman-blood-diamonds-congo/ (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[93] Central de Compras Públicas (2020), PERÚ COMPRAS registró en blockchain más de 154 mil órdenes de compra, https://www.gob.pe/institucion/perucompras/noticias/297606-peru-compras-registro-en-blockchain-mas-de-154-mil-ordenes-de-compra.
[126] Charon, P. and J. Jeangène Vilmer (2021), Chinese Influence Operations: A Machiavellian Moment, Institute for Strategic Research (IRSEM), Paris.
[98] Cieślik, A. and Ł. Goczek (2018), “Control of corruption, international investment, and economic growth – Evidence from panel data”, World Development, Vol. 103, pp. 323-335, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.028.
[176] Conley, H. et al. (2016), The Kremlin Playbook: Understanding Russian Influence in Central and Eastern Europe, Rowman and Littlefield, London.
[141] Conway, D. and B. Hermann (2021), Dealing with corruption in adopting and implementing carbon taxes, U4, https://www.u4.no/publications/dealing-with-corruption-in-adopting-and-implementing-carbon-tax.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2023).
[138] Conway, E. and N. Oreskes (2010), Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury, London.
[142] Correctiv (2022), The Gazprom Lobby: How Russia enlisted German politicians, business leaders and lawyers to ensure German dependence on Russian gas, https://correctiv.org/en/latest-stories/2022/10/07/gazprom-lobby-germany/ (accessed on 4 March 2024).
[42] Council of Europe (2024), CONSULTATIVE COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN PROSECUTORS (CCPE) - CCPE Opinion No. 19 (2024) on “Managing prosecution services to ensure their independence and impartiality”, Council of Europe, https://rm.coe.int/opinion-no-19-2024-of-the-ccpe/1680b25297.
[43] Council of Europe (2019), CONSULTATIVE COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN PROSECUTORS (CCPE) - Opinion No. 14 (2019) on “The role of prosecutors in fighting corruption and related economic and financial crime”, Council of Europe, https://rm.coe.int/opinion-14-ccpe-en/168099399f.
[44] Council of Europe (2010), CM/Rec(2010)12 - Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 November 2010 at the 1098th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies), https://search.coe.int/cm?i=09000016805afb78.
[116] Crepaz, M. (2020), “To inform, strategise, collaborate, or compete: what use do lobbyists make of lobby registers?”, European Political Science Review, Vol. 12/3, pp. 347-369, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000156.
[2] Damijan, S. (2023), “Corruption: A Review of Issues”, Economic and Business Review, Vol. 25/1, pp. 1-10, https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1314.
[17] Dellis, K. and D. Sondermann (2017), “Lobbying in Europe: New firm-level evidence”, European Central Bank, , Working Paper Series, Vol. 2071.
[59] Department for Work & Pensions (2023), Fraud and Error in Welfare Benefits, 2016 to 2022: British Social Attitudes Survey, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fraud-and-error-in-welfare-benefits-2016-to-2022-british-social-attitudes-survey/fraud-and-error-in-welfare-benefits-2016-to-2022-british-social-attitudes-survey (accessed on 13 October 2025).
[54] Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union (n.d.), VAT Carousel Fraud, https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/taxation/vat/fight-against-vat-fraud/vat-carousel-fraud_en (accessed on 20 January 2026).
[179] EEAS (2023), 1st EEAS Report on Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Threats Towards a framework for networked defence, European External Action Service.
[194] EITI (2023), Race to renewables: Tackling corruption and integrity risks in the renewable energy sector, Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, https://eiti.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/EITI_Report_Race%20to%20renewables.pdf (accessed on 19 March 2024).
[67] European Commission (2025), 36th Annual Report on the Protection of the European Union’s financial interests and the Fight against fraud, https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/document/download/951f690a-7925-4ac1-bdbb-07ff1375ee8a_en?filename=pif-report-2024_en.pdf.
[82] European Commission (2025), COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EVALUATION of Directive 2014/23/EU on Concessions, Directive 2014/24/EU on Public Procurement and Directive 2014/25/EU on Utilities, https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=SWD(2025)332&lang=en (accessed on 26 February 2026).
[68] European Commission (2025), Follow-up by Member States to the recommendations of the PIF Report 2023, https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/document/download/023e851e-1447-4f8e-83fa-e334eb8e6392_en?filename=pif-report-2024-follow-up-ms_en.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2025).
[180] European Commission (2023), Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of interest representation carried out on behalf of third countries and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937, https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-12/COM_2023_637_2_EN_ACT_part1_v4.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2023).
[57] European Commission (2021), Notice on tools to fight collusion in public procurement and on guidance on how to apply the related exclusion ground, https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/45004.
[56] European Court of Auditors (2024), Double funding from the EU budget, https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14408-2024-ADD-4/en/pdf.
[83] European Court of Auditors (2023), “Special report 28/2023: Public procurement in the EU – Less competition for contracts awarded for works, goods and services in the 10 years up to 2021”, https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications?ref=sr-2023-28 (accessed on 26 February 2026).
[80] European Parliamentary Research Service (2023), “A Quantitative Analysis of the Costs of Corruption in the EU”, Stepping Up the EU’s Efforts to Tackle Corruption: Cost of Non-Europe Report, pp. 31-77, https://doi.org/10.2861/796351.
[65] European Public Prosecutor’s Office (2025), EPPO Annual Report 2024, https://www.eppo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2025-03/EPPO%20Annual%20Report%202024_2.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2025).
[5] European Union (2025), Special Eurobarometer 561: Citizens’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU in 2025, https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3361 (accessed on 25 February 2026).
[52] Europol (2025), European Union Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment – The changing DNA of serious and organised crime, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/EU-SOCTA-2025.pdf (accessed on 18 August 2025).
[94] Europol (2024), Decoding the EU’s most threatening criminal networks.
[160] Europol (2022), Environmental crime in the age of climate change: 2022 threat assessment, Europol, https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/Environmental%20Crime%20in%20the%20Age%20of%20Climate%20Change%20-%20Public%20report_5.pdf (accessed on 28 February 2024).
[95] Europol (2021), Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment.
[7] Fazekas, M., S. Sberna and A. Vannucci (2022), “The extra-legal governance of corruption: Tracing the organization of corruption in public procurement”, Governance, Vol. 35/4, pp. 1139-1161, https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12648.
[154] Friends of the Earth (2023), Mining the Depths of Influence: How industry is forging the EU Critical Raw Materials Act, https://friendsoftheearth.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mining-the-depths-of-influence.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[128] Graham, N., S. Daub and W. Carroll (2017), Mapping Political Influence: Political Donations and Lobbying by the Fossil Fuel Industry in BC.
[32] Hamada, Y. and K. Agrawal (eds.) (2025), Political Finance in the Digital Age: Towards Evidence-Based Reforms, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2025.28.
[120] Heywood, P. et al. (2017), Integrity and Integrity Management in Public Life, University of Birmingham.
[72] Hlacs, A. and H. Wells (2025), “Using digital technology to strengthen oversight of public procurement in Portugal: The use of data analytics and machine learning by the Tribunal de Contas”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 83, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/43add03b-en.
[75] Home Office (2025), Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: Guidance to organisations on the offence of failure to prevent fraud, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/offence-of-failure-to-prevent-fraud-introduced-by-eccta/economic-crime-and-corporate-transparency-act-2023-guidance-to-organisations-on-the-offence-of-failure-to-prevent-fraud-accessible-version#chapter-1-introduction (accessed on 17 October 2025).
[146] Huter, M. et al. (2018), Revolving Doors and the Fossil Fuel Industry: Time to tackle conflicts of interest in climate policy-making.
[28] IDEA (2025), Combatting Corruption in Political Finance: Global Trends, Challenges and Solutions, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2025.8.
[35] IDEA (2016), Protecting Politics: Deterring The Influence of Organized Crime on Elections, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/protecting-politics-deterring-influence-organized-crime-elections (accessed on 7 January 2026).
[133] IDEA (2014), Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns, A Handbook on Political Finance, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
[23] IDEA (n.d.), The 2024 Global Elections Super-Cycle, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), https://www.idea.int/initiatives/the-2024-global-elections-supercycle (accessed on 12 January 2026).
[149] IEA (2023), Critical Minerals Market Review 2023, International Energy Agency, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/afc35261-41b2-47d4-86d6-d5d77fc259be/CriticalMineralsMarketReview2023.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[150] IEA (2023), Energy Technology Perspectives 2023, International Energy Agency.
[147] IEA (2021), The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, International Energy Agency, https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[140] Influence Map (2022), Big Oil’s Real Agenda on Climate Change 2022, Influence Map, https://influencemap.org/report/Big-Oil-s-Agenda-on-Climate-Change-2022-19585 (accessed on 1 October 2023).
[143] Influence Map (2022), The EU’s Green Deal vs The Fossil Gas Industry, https://influencemap.org/EN/report/Gas-Lobbying-And-the-EU-Green-Deal-16405 (accessed on 4 March 2024).
[130] Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament (2023), Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament: China, https://isc.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ISC-China.pdf (accessed on 27 October 2023).
[77] International Public Sector Fraud Forum (2025), Fraud Loss Measurement Framework, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-public-sector-fraud-forum-guidance/fraud-loss-measurement-framework-html (accessed on 16 October 2025).
[58] International Public Sector Fraud Forum (2020), Guide to Understanding the Total Impact of Fraud, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5e4bedb986650c10e5a91d89/2377_The_Impact_of_Fraud_AW__4_.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2025).
[162] International Public Sector Fraud Forum (2020), International Public Sector Fraud Forum: The use of Artificial Intelligence to Combat Public Sector Fraud, Professional Guidance, International Public Sector Fraud Forum, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/865721/Artificial_intelligence_13_Feb.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[119] Jenkins, M. (2022), The effectiveness of integrity led anti-corruption interventions, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute.
[101] Johnston, M. (1999), Public Officials, Private Interests, and Sustainable Democracy: When Politics and Corruption Meet, Peterson Institute for International Economics, https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2206720/3-public-officials-private-interests-and-sustainable-democracy/2963082/ (accessed on 20 February 2024).
[184] Jones, K. (2023), Legal loopholes and the risk of foreign interference, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2023/702575/EXPO_IDA(2023)702575_EN.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2023).
[193] Kotlyar, D. and L. Pop (2021), Automated Risk Analysis of Asset and Interest Declarations of Public Officials: A Technical Guide, Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative, https://star.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/Automated%20Risk%20Analysis-publication.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[124] Lee, K. and H. You (2023), “Bureaucratic Revolving Doors and Interest Group Participation in Policy Making”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 85/2, pp. 701-717, https://doi.org/10.1086/722340.
[187] Lee, P. (2024), “Synthetic Data and the Future of AI”, 110 Cornell Law Review (Forthcoming), https://ssrn.com/abstract=4722162 (accessed on 4 March 2024).
[183] Levin, D. (2016), “When the Great Power Gets a Vote: The Effects of Great Power Electoral Interventions on Election Results”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60/2, pp. 189-202, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqv016.
[34] Luminate (2022), Youth and Democracy in Latin America, https://luminategroup.com/storage/1459/EN_Youth_Democracy_Latin_America.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2026).
[99] Mark E. Warren (2014), “The meaning of Corruption in Democracies”, in Heywood, P. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Political Corruption, Routledge.
[136] McCarthy, N. (2019), “Oil And Gas Giants Spend Millions Lobbying To Block Climate Change Policies”, Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2019/03/25/oil-and-gas-giants-spend-millions-lobbying-to-block-climate-change-policies-infographic/?sh=7ac2858e7c4f (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[64] Merran McAlister and Samantha Bricknell (2025), Fraud against the Commonwealth 2023-24, Australian Government, Australian Institute of Criminology, https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-07/sb47_fraud_against_the_commonwealth_2023-24.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2025).
[114] Mialon, M., B. Swinburn and G. Sacks (2015), “A proposed approach to systematically identify and monitor the corporate political activity of the food industry with respect to public health using publicly available information”, Obesity Reviews, Vol. 16/7, pp. 519-530, https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12289.
[100] Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2011), Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned, Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256017483_Contextual_Choices_in_Fighting_Corruption_Lessons_Learned (accessed on 20 February 2024).
[175] Murphy, M. (2024), “Biden Audio Deepfake Alarms Experts in Lead-Up to Elections”, Time, https://time.com/6565446/biden-deepfake-audio/ (accessed on 5 February 2024).
[31] Muzergues, T. (ed.) (2024), Financing Politics in Europe: a Political Party Roadmap for More Transparency and Effectiveness, https://www.martenscentre.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Financing-Politics-in-Europe.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2026).
[117] Năstase, A. and C. Muurmans (2020), “Regulating lobbying activities in the European Union: A voluntary club perspective”, Regulation & Governance, Vol. 14/2, pp. 238-255, https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12200.
[60] National Audit Office (2024), An Overview of the impact of fraud and error on public funds for the new Parliament 2023-24, National Audit Office, https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fraud-overview-2023-24.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2025).
[178] NATO (n.d.), Countering hybrid threats, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_156338.htm#:~:text=What%20are%20the%20hybrid%20threats,and%20use%20of%20regular%20forces. (accessed on 5 October 2023).
[174] Nay, J. (2023), Large Language Models as Lobbyists, https://law.stanford.edu/2023/01/06/large-language-models-as-lobbyists/ (accessed on 22 February 2024).
[46] New Zealand Government (2023), New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey, https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/NZCVS-2023-Key-Stories-Cycle-6.pdf (accessed on 23 October 2025).
[171] NY Times (2023), “How ChatGPT Hijacks Democracy”, https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/15/opinion/ai-chatgpt-lobbying-democracy.html (accessed on 19 September 2023).
[41] OECD (2026), OECD Public Integrity Indicators (database), https://oecd-public-integrity-indicators.org/ (accessed on 19 January 2026).
[85] OECD (2025), Code of Conduct and Guidance to Enhance Integrity Amongst Public Procurement Practitioners in Greece, Greek National Transparency Authority, https://aead.gr/images/TSI-EU/Final_CoC_integrity_public_procur_Greece_EN_1832025FV.pdf (accessed on 18 December 2025).
[9] OECD (2025), Companies’ assessments of anti-corruption compliance, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/977ed5a8-en.
[88] OECD (2025), Developing a data-driven corruption risk model to strengthen integrity in Belgium: Practical considerations for the Federal Internal Audit, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e85587eb-en.
[90] OECD (2025), “Digital transformation of public procurement: Good practice report”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 77, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/79651651-en.
[70] OECD (2025), Governing with Artificial Intelligence: The State of Play and Way Forward in Core Government Functions, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/795de142-en.
[12] OECD (2025), Implementing the OECD Recommendation on Public Procurement in OECD and Partner Countries: 2020-2024 Report, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/02a46a58-en.
[78] OECD (2025), Integrity Breaches in Public Procurement, Greek National Transparency Authority, https://aead.gr/images/TSI-EU/Fin_IntegrityBreaches_v2.pdf.
[84] OECD (2025), OECD Integrity Review of Sweden, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/648d3988-en.
[45] OECD (2025), “Sustainability of public finances in OECD countries: From fiscal consolidation to state redesign?”, OECD Papers on Budgeting, No. 2025/12, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/df89a38a-en.
[20] OECD (2024), Anti-Corruption and Integrity Outlook 2024, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/968587cd-en.
[66] OECD (2024), Designing a National Strategy against Tax Crime: Core Elements and Considerations, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0e451c90-en.
[30] OECD (2024), “Enhancing co-operation between internal and external auditors: Towards a well-co-ordinated and strengthened public sector audit to ensure public accountability”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 67, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0d4976ed-en.
[18] OECD (2024), OECD Anti-Bribery Convention Phase 4 Two-Year Follow-Up Report on Poland, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/12/oecd-anti-bribery-convention-phase-4-two-year-follow-up-report-on-poland_545b8761/83945426-en.pdf.
[192] OECD (2024), OECD Public Integrity Indicators Database, https://data-explorer.oecd.org/ (accessed on 18 March 2024).
[8] OECD (2024), OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions – 2024 Results: Building Trust in a Complex Policy Environment, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en.
[21] OECD (2024), Strengthening the Transparency and Integrity of Foreign Influence Activities in France: A Tool for Tackling Foreign Interference Risks, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/438da77f-en.
[26] OECD (2024), “The interaction between competition and democracy”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 316, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/8b3a575f-en.
[169] OECD (2023), “Advancing accountability in AI: Governing and managing risks throughout the lifecycle for trustworthy AI”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 349, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2448f04b-en.
[135] OECD (2023), Government at a Glance 2023, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3d5c5d31-en.
[89] OECD (2023), “Managing risks in the public procurement of goods, services and infrastructure”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 33, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/45667d2f-en.
[22] OECD (2023), Public integrity in Malta: Improving the integrity and transparency framework for elected and appointed officials, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0ecc469e-en.
[148] OECD (2023), Responsible is reliable – How responsible sourcing can address disruption factors and geopolitical risks in the supply of transition minerals, OECD, Paris, https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/duediligence/Responsible_is_Reliable.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[163] OECD (2023), Tax Administration 2023: Comparative Information on OECD and other Advanced and Emerging Economies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/900b6382-en.
[102] OECD (2022), Building Trust to Reinforce Democracy: Main Findings from the 2021 OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions, Building Trust in Public Institutions, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b407f99c-en.
[177] OECD (2022), “Declaration on Building Trust and Reinforcing Democracy”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0484, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0484.
[144] OECD (2022), “Governing Green: Gearing up government to deliver on climate and other environmental challenges”, in Building Trust and Reinforcing Democracy: Preparing the Ground for Government Action, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/45cc57a7-en.
[86] OECD (2022), “Integrating responsible business conduct in public procurement supply chains: Economic benefits to governments”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 14, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c5350587-en.
[134] OECD (2022), The Protection and Promotion of Civic Space: Strengthening Alignment with International Standards and Guidance, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d234e975-en.
[36] OECD (2022), The Protection and Promotion of Civic Space: Strengthening Alignment with International Standards and Guidance, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d234e975-en.
[103] OECD (2021), Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Big Data in Finance: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications for Policy Makers, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/finance/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-big-data-in-finance.htm (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[161] OECD (2021), Countering Public Grant Fraud in Spain: Machine Learning for Assessing Risks and Targeting Control Activities, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0ea22484-en.
[152] OECD (2021), Frequently Asked Questions: How to address bribery and corruption risks in mineral supply chains, OECD, Paris, https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/faq-how-to-address-bribery-and-corruption-risks-in-mineral-supply-chains.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[108] OECD (2021), Government at a Glance 2021, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en.
[16] OECD (2021), Lobbying in the 21st Century: Transparency, Integrity and Access, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c6d8eff8-en.
[112] OECD (2021), Lobbying in the 21st Century: Transparency, Integrity and Access, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c6d8eff8-en.
[166] OECD (2021), OECD Business and Finance Outlook 2021: AI in Business and Finance, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ba682899-en.
[38] OECD (2021), “Recommendation of the Council on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0463, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0463 (accessed on 22 January 2026).
[49] OECD (2020), Countering Fraud in Social Benefit Programmes: Taking Stock of Current Measures and Future Directions, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/71df2657-en.
[106] OECD (2020), OECD Public Integrity Handbook, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ac8ed8e8-en.
[14] OECD (2020), OECD Public Integrity Handbook, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ac8ed8e8-en.
[40] OECD (2020), “The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six dimensions of a Digital Government”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 02, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en.
[168] OECD (2019), Analytics for Integrity: Data-Driven Approaches for Enhancing Fraud and Corruption Risk Assessments, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/analytics-for-integrity.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2023).
[188] OECD (2019), Guidelines on Anti-corruption and Integrity in State-Owned Enterprises, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Guidelines-Anti-Corruption-Integrity-State-Owned-Enterprises.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2023).
[191] OECD (2019), “Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0449, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449.
[189] OECD (2018), Investing in Integrity for Productivity, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/investing-in-integrity-for-productivity.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2023).
[122] OECD (2017), Preventing Policy Capture: Integrity in Public Decision Making, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065239-en.
[190] OECD (2017), “Recommendation of the Council on Open Government”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0438, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0438.
[37] OECD (2017), “Recommendation of the Council on Open Government”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0438, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0438 (accessed on 5 February 2024).
[110] OECD (2017), “Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0435, OECD Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0435.
[11] OECD (2017), “Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0435, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0435.
[131] OECD (2016), Financing Democracy: Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns and the Risk of Policy Capture, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264249455-en.
[25] OECD (2016), Financing Democracy: Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns and the Risk of Policy Capture, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264249455-en.
[79] OECD (2016), Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://baselgovernance.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/oecd_preventing_corruption_in_public_procurement_2016.pdf.
[81] OECD (2015), “Recommendation of the Council on Public Procurement”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0411, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0411.
[121] OECD (2014), Lobbyists, Governments and Public Trust, Volume 3: Implementing the OECD Principles for Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264214224-en.
[111] OECD (2010), “Recommendation of the Council on Principles for Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0379, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0379.
[15] OECD (2010), “Recommendation of the Council on Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying and Influence”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0379, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0379.
[118] OECD (2003), OECD Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service, OECD, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/48994419.pdf (accessed on 29 September 2023).
[19] OECD (2003), “Recommendation of the Council on OECD Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service”, OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0316, OECD, Paris, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0316.
[165] Parycek, P., V. Schmid and A. Novak (2023), “Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3.
[155] Politico (2023), “Lobbying ‘frenzy’ follows Biden’s electric car push”, https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/17/biden-electric-car-lobbying-companies-00091779 (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[24] Politics UK (2025), Explained: World Elections in 2025, https://politicsuk.com/explained-world-elections-in-2025/ (accessed on 12 January 2026).
[145] Pons-Hernández, M. (2022), “Power(ful) Connections: Exploring the Revolving Doors Phenomenon as a Form of State-Corporate Crime”, Critical Criminology, Vol. 30/2, pp. 305-320, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-022-09626-z.
[76] Presidency of the Council of Ministers (2021), DECREE LAW No. 109-E/2021, Diário da República, https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/en/detail/decree-law/109-e-2021-175659840 (accessed on 27 October 2025).
[127] Resimić, M. (2022), Grand corruption and climate change policies: Overview of grand corruption evidence in energy transition, biodiversity loss and climate finance, U4, https://www.u4.no/publications/grand-corruption-and-climate-change-policies.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2023).
[33] Reuters Institute (2025), Digital News Report 2025, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2025-06/Digital_News-Report_2025.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2026).
[55] Robert Mungai (2024), Synthetic Identity Fraud a Critical Primary National Security Priority, Institute of Professional Software Engineers-IPSE, https://d197for5662m48.cloudfront.net/documents/publicationstatus/201158/preprint_pdf/43065b026866c6c0c52bbf0f86bf239c.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2026).
[173] Sanders, N. and B. Schneier (2023), How AI could write our laws, MIT Technology Review, https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/03/14/1069717/how-ai-could-write-our-laws/ (accessed on 22 February 2024).
[107] Shaheer, N. et al. (2019), “State-Owned Enterprises as Bribe Payers: The Role of Institutional Environment”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 159/1, pp. 221-238, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3768-z.
[115] Šimral, V. (2020), “Two problems with lobbying regulations in EEA countries”, Studies of Transition States and Societies, Vol. 12/1, pp. 53-67.
[137] Slowiczek, J. (2022), “Oil and gas heavily outspends clean energy, environmental groups on California lobbying”, Energy News Network, https://energynews.us/2022/03/17/oil-and-gas-heavily-outspends-clean-energy-environmental-groups-on-california-lobbying%EF%BF%BC/ (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[125] Strickland, J. (2023), “The contingent value of connections: legislative turnover and revolving-door lobbyists”, Business and Politics, Vol. 25/2, pp. 152-172, https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2023.4.
[139] Supran, G. and N. Oreskes (2017), “Assessing ExxonMobil’s climate change communications (1977–2014)”, Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 12/8, p. 084019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f.
[47] Sveriges Riksbank (2024), Fraud is the fastest growing type of crime in Sweden, https://www.riksbank.se/en-gb/payments--cash/payments-in-sweden/payments-report--2024/safety-efficiency-and-accessibility/are-payments-in-sweden-safe/fraud-is-the-fastest-growing-type-of-crime-in-sweden/ (accessed on 23 October 2025).
[158] The Africa Report (2023), “Glencore launches in-house lobbying as US targets cobalt operations in DRC”, https://www.theafricareport.com/314548/glencore-launches-in-house-lobbying-as-us-targets-cobalt-operations-in-drc/ (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[170] The Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme (2023), Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme, https://robodebt.royalcommission.gov.au/system/files/2023-09/rrc-accessible-full-report.PDF (accessed on 4 March 2024).
[53] The World Bank (2017), Public Sector Internal Audit: Focus on Fraud, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington DC, https://cfrr.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/public_sector_internal_audit_fraud_pages.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2025).
[4] The World Bank (n.d.), World Bank Enterprise Surveys, https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/en/data/exploretopics/corruption?subGroup=-1&subtopic=59 (accessed on 28 January 2026).
[153] TI (2022), Corruption in Critical Minerals Puts the Energy Transition at Risk, Transparency International Australia, https://transparency.org.au/corruption-minerals-energy-transition-risk/ (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[151] TI (2017), Corruption Risks in Mining Approvals: A Global Snapshot.
[29] Transparency International (2025), Who pays for politics? Tracing the money trail online, https://www.transparency.org/en/news/who-pays-for-politics (accessed on 7 January 2026).
[63] U.S. Department of Justice - Office of Public Affairs (2025), National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/national-health-care-fraud-takedown-results-324-defendants-charged-connection-over-146#:~:text=The%20Justice%20Department%20today%20announced,and%2012%20State%20Attorneys%20General%27s (accessed on 20 January 2026).
[74] U.S. Government Accountability Office (2026), Combating Fraud: Approaches to Evaluate Effectiveness and Demonstrate Integrity, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-26-107609.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2026).
[1] U4 (2017), The relationship between business integrity and commercial success, https://www.u4.no/publications/the-relationship-between-business-integrity-and-commercial-success (accessed on 28 January 2026).
[164] U4 (n.d.), Exploring artificial intelligence for anti-corruption, https://www.u4.no/publications/artificial-intelligence-a-promising-anti-corruption-tool-in-development-settings/shortversion (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[69] Ugale, G. and C. Hall (2024), “Generative AI for anti-corruption and integrity in government: Taking stock of promise, perils and practice”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 12, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/657a185a-en.
[73] UK National Audit Office (2025), Estimating and reporting fraud and error in annual reports and accounts, https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/estimating-and-reporting-fraud-and-error.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2025).
[61] UK Parliament (2022), PAC says government “complacent” about preventing “eye-watering” levels of fraud in the Covid Bounceback Loan Scheme, https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/public-accounts-committee/news/166067/pac-says-government-complacent-about-preventing-eyewatering-levels-of-fraud-in-the-covid-bounceback-loan-scheme/ (accessed on 20 January 2026).
[62] United States Government Accountability Office (2023), Unemployment Insurance: Estimated Amount of Fraud during Pandemic Likely Between $100 Billion and $135 Billion, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-106696.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2025).
[3] United States Trade Representative (2025), 2025 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program, https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Reports/2025NTE.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2026).
[13] UNODC (2025), Money Laundering, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/money-laundering/overview.html (accessed on 28 January 2026).
[48] UNODC (2024), Organized Fraud Issue Paper, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/Publications/IssuePaperFraud-eBook.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2025).
[97] UNODC (2021), Organized Crime Strategy Toolkit for Developing High Impact Strategies, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, https://www.unodc.org/cld/uploads/pdf/Strategies/OC_Strategy_Toolkit_Ebook.pdf.
[181] US Department of Homeland Security (2018), Foreign Interference Taxonomy, https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/19_0717_cisa_foreign-influence-taxonomy.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2023).
[129] Vandewalker, I. and L. Norden (2021), “Using Campaign Finance Reform to Protect U.S. Elections from “Dark Money” and Foreign Influence”, in Defending Democracies, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197556979.003.0016.
[172] WFD and POPVOX (2023), How artificial intelligence and large language models may impact transparency, https://www.wfd.org/news/how-artificial-intelligence-and-large-language-models-may-impact-transparency (accessed on 22 February 2024).
[10] WJP (2025), World Justice Project Rule of Law Index, https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/global (accessed on 28 January 2026).
[105] Zelikow, P. et al. (2020), “The Rise of Strategic Corruption: How States Weaponize Graft”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 99/4, pp. 107-120.
[109] Zuzana Smidova, Agnès Cavaciuti and Jesper Johnsøn (2022), OECD Public Integrity Indicators – New data on quality of anti-corruption and public integrity strategies – ECOSCOPE, https://oecdecoscope.blog/2022/08/26/oecd-public-integrity-indicators-new-data-on-quality-of-anti-corruption-and-public-integrity-strategies/?subscribe=success#subscribe-blog-blog_subscription-3 (accessed on 5 January 2023).