As AI systems become more widely adopted, understanding how related risks emerge and evolve is increasingly important. Media-reported AI incidents and hazards offer valuable insights into the types, frequency, and impact of AI-related harms. This paper analyses real-time data from the OECD.AI Incidents and Hazards Monitor (AIM), organising media reports into 14 thematic clusters. It identifies three broad patterns of proportional media coverage – increasing, intermittent, and declining – and tracks how attention shifts across themes such as synthetic media, child safety, cyberattacks, privacy, and health. While some risks are gaining visibility relative to others, certain themes are receiving comparatively less coverage over time. This analysis offers a structured view of media-reported AI incidents and hazards, supporting more informed discussions on the real-world impacts of AI systems.
Trends in AI incidents and hazards reported by the media
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
Evidence from selected countries and the European Union
7 May 202658 Pages -
Working paper
Global linkages and the cross‑country distribution of the gains from AI
18 March 202679 Pages -
Working paper
International insights and policy considerations for Italy
11 December 2025100 Pages -
8 December 202543 Pages
-
1 December 202530 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
Insights from responses to the reporting framework of the Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct
25 September 202537 Pages -
17 June 202531 Pages
-
Policy paper3 June 202546 Pages
-
28 February 202526 Pages
-
9 February 202548 Pages
-
16 December 202419 Pages