Governments are increasingly utilising research and innovation (R&I) policy to foster economic and societal change. Yet, the empirical correlation between these policies and socio-technical transformations remains under-explored. The report investigates this relationship by comparing the Recovery and Resilience Plans (RRPs) of Austria, Finland and Sweden, initiated under the NextGenerationEU framework post Covid-19. The report finds significant disparities in the content, process and transformative value of the RRPs among these countries. The differences in the content of the national RRPs, and the ability and willingness to seize the opportunity presented by the RRPs to drive transformation, are explained by existing national policy contexts and frameworks. Surprisingly, the role of R&I policy in the RRPs is less important than expected, despite its emphasised importance in literature and political rhetoric. The report further identifies implications for a transformative innovation policy as well as areas for further research.
Transformative innovation policy in practice in Austria, Finland and Sweden
What do the Recovery and Resilience Plans tell us about linking transformation and innovation policy?
Policy paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
4 December 202563 Pages
-
1 December 202537 Pages
-
Policy paper
A case study within the OECD’s Global Green Iron project
22 October 202564 Pages -
20 October 202555 Pages
-
Policy paper9 October 202554 Pages
-
Policy paper5 September 202546 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
Insights from new data sources and AI‑assisted methods
26 November 202562 Pages -
Policy brief5 September 20255 Pages
-
Report
Complementary guidance to the OECD Frascati Manual 2015 edition
30 June 202537 Pages -
Working paper
The new green economy
27 June 202571 Pages