One in a set of two papers on interoperable carbon intensity metrics, this report analyses freely available and commercial datasets on the carbon intensities of aluminium, cement and steel across a wide range of installations and countries. It evaluates them in terms of granularity, timeliness, accuracy and comparability. The findings show that differences between these datasets lead to discrepancies in reported carbon intensities, which are larger at the installation level than at aggregate level (i.e. country or country groups). Overall trends in carbon intensity across datasets are consistent, suggesting that they are still useful to monitor progress and gauge disparities across countries and installations’ carbon intensities. They, however, fall short of the precision needed for policy design and implementation that mandate payments or other obligations based on product- or installation-level carbon intensity. Strengthening data collection and interoperability, particularly through policy-mandated reporting, is essential to enhance the accuracy and comparability of carbon intensity metrics and support effective industrial decarbonisation.
Towards interoperable carbon intensity metrics
Assessing and comparing selected data sources
Policy paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Policy paper
A methodological framework
27 January 202677 Pages -
Policy paper
Assessing monitoring, reporting and verification systems
30 June 202575 Pages -
Policy paper
Evidence from a comprehensive and systematic review of the ex‑post empirical literature
15 May 202580 Pages -
Policy paper13 December 202436 Pages
-
11 December 202444 Pages
-
Policy paper
An IFCMA report
4 November 2024111 Pages -
15 October 202431 Pages
-
Policy paper
A methodological note to support GHG mapping for the IFCMA country pilot studies
10 October 202437 Pages
Related publications
-
26 February 2026245 Pages -
Report
Where we stand, where we need to go and how to get there
1 December 202530 Pages -
9 October 2025145 Pages