Similarly to other education systems, Ireland faces some challenges related to SAP that are rooted in monitoring limitations, institutional constraints and school-level disparities. The key issues introduced here are explored more comprehensively in the following sections, which analyse how legal, policy and governance frameworks influence national and local responses.
Monitoring challenges related to SAP in Ireland include difficulties linking data on student characteristics and outcomes with absence data. Moreover, there is a need for more qualitative data to better understand SAP, as factors such as student well-being, family circumstances and mental health often go unreported in attendance records, complicating policy and response efforts.
In Ireland, schools are responsible for reporting attendance data to Tusla Education Support Services (TESS) (TESS, n.d.[8]). However, TESS lacks the authority to enforce reporting and there are no penalties if schools do not report. As such, data collected are not fully comprehensive. In 2022/23, for instance, only 78% and 71% of primary and secondary schools, respectively, submitted the Annual Attendance Reports (TESS, 2024[7]).
Additionally, Irish schools report only twice a year the number of students (aged 6-16) who miss 20 or more school days in the school year through a secure online portal (TESS, 2023[6]). Annually, schools also report total school days lost due to absence, numbers of students expelled and suspensions. Absences must be categorised by illness, urgent family reasons, holidays, suspensions and other reasons (ibid.). TESS, in conjunction with the Department of Education and Youth, aggregates and publishes these data, but several gaps persist. For instance, data on SEN (apart from reduced school days and students in special needs schools), gender identity, sexual orientation and giftedness are not collected. While some schools gather socio-economic and ethnic data (e.g. Traveller and Roma populations), individual-level access, crucial for measuring intervention impacts, is unavailable to TESS. TESS faces further challenges in linking students’ outcomes with absence data, including academic outcomes and population-wide well-being information, possibly due to some barriers in effective cross-agency co-ordination.
Following the COVID-19 pandemic, Ireland has also seen a noticeable rise in casual non-attendance due to changing parental perceptions about daily schooling, the cost-of-living crisis, transportation issues, and increased suspensions or expulsions in special schools, potentially linked to pandemic closures.
These challenges are present in a system where teachers may lack relevant capacity to support attendance, and where system priorities may not consistently shape school practice without leadership engagement.
To address some of these concerns, this Education Policy Perspectives paper is structured as follows. Section 2 summarises key features of the governance, legal and policy frameworks on school attendance in Ireland and other countries. Section 3 then focuses on key enablers that can drive change in strengthening the legal and policy framework around SAP in Ireland. It outlines collaboration among departments and agencies in regard to SAP, engagement and responsibilities of parents as well as wider education community, data collection and leadership. The final section provides a summary of the findings and some policy considerations.