Table of contents
This country note shows how Czechia compares with other OECD countries in Pensions at a Glance 2025. This edition covers recent pension reforms and includes a focus on gender pension gaps.
At 10%, the gender pension gap in Czechia is among the lowest in the OECD
Copy link to At 10%, the gender pension gap in Czechia is among the lowest in the OECDThe average pension of women was 10% lower than that of men in Czechia in 2024, which is one of the lowest differences in the OECD. The gender pension gap is less than half the OECD average of 23%, and it is only smaller in Estonia, Iceland and the Slovak Republic. The gender pension gap is small in comparison to the gender gap in expected lifetime earnings, at 38% just above the OECD average of 35% in 2022, due to a combination of high female labour market participation rates prior to the 1990s and several redistributive features in the Czech pension system.
In Czechia, the pension gap in lifetime earnings is largely driven by shorter expected careers and lower hourly wages, whereas differences in working hours play a modest role: in 2023, women on average earned 18% less per hour than men and their careers were 6.6 years shorter, while they only worked 2.8 fewer hours per week. The highly progressive calculation of the pension benefit – the benefit consists of a contributory basic component for which entitlements are not linked to individual earnings level, as well as of an earnings-related component in which earnings up to 42% of economy-wide average earnings have much more weight than earnings in excess of that limit – avoids that the significant gender gap in earnings translates into a sizable gender gap in pensions. Furthermore, Czechia is one of nine OECD countries that give credits just for having had children or that provide pension bonuses to parents, irrespective of whether a career break occurred. Child-related pension credits can reduce the impact of women’s shorter career length on their pensions.
Czechia has a low gender pension gap
Copy link to Czechia has a low gender pension gapPercentage difference of average pension of women relative to average pension of men
Future retirement age is just above‑average
Copy link to Future retirement age is just above‑averageAge from which a man is eligible to full retirement benefits after a full career from age 22 in 2024
The Czech pension system does contain some features that could be disadvantageous to women. Czechia is currently one of five OECD countries where mothers can retire earlier than childless women, alongside France, Italy, the Slovak Republic and Slovenia. Depending on the number of children, mothers can currently retire between one and four years earlier than childless women in Czechia, although this possibility is set to disappear in 2037. A lower retirement age also means a shorter contributory period, and therefore lower pensions. At the same time, the very long 35‑year career requirement to retire at the normal retirement age, currently at 64 years and 2 months and increasing to 65 by 2032, particularly affects women even if it concerns a minimal share of older people. Finally, the low level of survivor’s pensions in Czechia means that they play a limited role in reducing the gender pension gap, unlike in many other countries.
The higher retirement age will help improve financial sustainability
Copy link to The higher retirement age will help improve financial sustainabilityCzechia is one of only two OECD countries that decided to increase the normal retirement age over the last two years, but retirement ages will increase in a majority of OECD countries due to earlier reforms. The normal retirement age is set to increase from 64.2 years for men retiring now, around half a year below the OECD average, to 67 years for men entering the labour market now, around half a year above the OECD average. Current and future normal retirement ages are the same for men and women in Czechia, as for the vast majority of OECD countries. The statutory retirement age was already increasing by two months per year until reaching 65 in 2030. Based on the 2024 reform, the retirement age is set to increase further after 2030, but at a slower pace: it will go up by one month per year until it reaches 67 in 2056. This pace is close to what would be required to keep the relative share of time spent working and time spent in retirement constant, as proposed in the 2020 OECD review of the Czech pension system. Moreover, Czechia has introduced an option for workers to retire without penalty 15 months before the statutory retirement age if they have worked at least about 10 years (more precisely, 2 200 shifts) in jobs deemed arduous or hazardous, or 30 months before with at least about 20 years (4 400 shifts).
In addition to increasing the retirement age, the 2024 reform has reduced future pension benefits by lowering the reference wage and the accrual rate over the period 2026‑2035. Czechia reduced its accrual rate slightly from 1.5% to 1.45% per year worked. The reduction in the reference wage, moving from taking into account 100% to 90% of earnings below 42% of economy-wide average earnings in the pension calculation, makes the pension system somewhat less redistributive. Despite this, the difference in future net replacement rates after a full career between a low and an average earner remains one of the highest in the OECD. The reference‑wage calculation and redistributive elements in the pension system result in an effective accrual rate for an average earner that is well below the legislated accrual-rate parameter of 1.45%: in the future an average earner will each year build up pension entitlements equal to 0.77% of earnings, below the OECD average of 1.05%.
With the effective contribution rate of 31.3% already among the highest in the OECD, there indeed is more space to improve financial sustainability of the pension system through adjustments to the retirement age and to pension levels. If the party that won the recent elections follows through on its campaign promise to roll back the retirement-age increase from 65 to 67, contribution rates would have to increase or pensions would have to be lowered further to offset the impact on pension finances.
Penalties have been reduced after long careers
Copy link to Penalties have been reduced after long careersThe penalty for early retirement and bonus for delaying pension uptake, at 4.8% for an average earner in Czechia, is close to the estimated actuarially neutral rate of 5.2%. However, different bonus and penalty rates apply to different components of the public pension: there is no bonus or penalty for the contributory basic part of the pension, whereas a 6% bonus and penalty rate applies to the earnings-related component. Due to the recent reform, the penalty on the earnings-related component will be halved (from 1.5% to 0.75% per 90 days of early take‑up) for workers retiring early after 45 years of contributions from 2026. It is not exceptional to exempt people with long careers from early-retirement penalties at least to some extent, as 10 OECD countries apply no penalty after a long career, including France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Yet, empirical evidence among others from France and Germany suggests that such rules may particularly benefit people who have been able to stay in good health, as people for whom health risks materialised are less likely to be attain the career length required.
Czech relative old-age poverty is well below the OECD average
The working-age population will shrink fast, undermining pension financing
The mandatory contribution rate is very high compared to the OECD average
Pension replacement rates are much higher for low earners than for average earners
Contact
Wouter DE TAVERNIER (✉ wouter.detavernier@oecd.org).
Hervé BOULHOL (✉ herve.boulhol@oecd.org).
This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Member countries of the OECD.
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.
The full book is available in English: OECD (2025), Pensions at a Glance 2025: OECD and G20 Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e40274c1-en.
© OECD 2025
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. By using this work, you accept to be bound by the terms of this licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Attribution – you must cite the work.
Translations – you must cite the original work, identify changes to the original and add the following text: In the event of any discrepancy between the original work and the translation, only the text of the original work should be considered valid.
Adaptations – you must cite the original work and add the following text: This is an adaptation of an original work by the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this adaptation should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its Member countries.
Third-party material – the licence does not apply to third-party material in the work. If using such material, you are responsible for obtaining permission from the third party and for any claims of infringement.
You must not use the OECD logo, visual identity or cover image without express permission or suggest the OECD endorses your use of the work.
Any dispute arising under this licence shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) Arbitration Rules 2012. The seat of arbitration shall be Paris (France). The number of arbitrators shall be one.