Recommendations 2014 | Progress in implementation |
|---|---|
Italy should determine its comparative advantage in humanitarian assistance; this should be used to help set clear, strategic and principled criteria to guide its future funding allocations. | Implemented |
Italy should improve the quality of its funding to partners, especially by improving the predictability, flexibility and timeliness of funding for NGOs | Partially implemented |
OECD Development Co‑operation Peer Reviews: Italy 2019
Annex A. Progress since the 2014 DAC peer review recommendations
Copy link to Annex A. Progress since the 2014 DAC peer review recommendationsGlobal efforts for sustainable development
Copy link to Global efforts for sustainable development|
Recommendations 2014 |
Progress in implementation |
|---|---|
|
In order to be more effective in voicing its concerns and support for global solutions, Italy is encouraged to consistently address a limited number of risks at international level and in its dialogue with its partner countries. |
Partially implemented |
|
Italy still needs to identify key policy areas to focus efforts, designate a mechanism with a clear mandate on PCD, and build systems for monitoring, analysis and policy feedback. |
Partially implemented |
|
Developing whole-of-government strategies at partner country level would facilitate a co-ordinated approach to Italian development co-operation and contribute to synergies between the different levers of Italian engagement. |
Not implemented |
Policy vision and framework
Copy link to Policy vision and framework|
Recommendations 2014 |
Progress in implementation |
|---|---|
|
A formal medium-term, results-oriented and widely owned strategic vision for development co‑operation would provide clarity for Italy’s stakeholders and partners in priority countries. |
Partially implemented |
|
Italy should maintain its geographic focus, and develop guidance on how to concentrate the aid programme in the sectors which coincide with its comparative advantages and partner countries’ development priorities. |
Partially implemented |
|
Gender equality and the environment should become explicit components of development activities, with improved guidance and targeted training for staff at headquarters and in partner countries on how to mainstream these themes. |
Partially implemented |
Financing for development
Copy link to Financing for development|
Recommendations 2014 |
Progress in implementation |
|---|---|
|
To comply with its international commitments, Italy needs to implement the path it has set for increasing steadily its ODA/GNI ratio. |
Partially implemented |
|
Italy needs to carefully manage the exit from non-priority countries in order to keep its bilateral development co-operation programme focused on a few countries, and plan how it will maintain its level of engagement in Africa. |
Partially implemented |
|
Concentrating on fewer strategic multilateral partners would enable Italy to engage with these partners over a longer term with predictable funding, and enhance synergies with the bilateral aid programme. |
Implemented |
Structure and systems
Copy link to Structure and systems|
Recommendations 2014 |
Progress in implementation |
|---|---|
|
In contemplating different institutional arrangements for its development co-operation, Italy should maintain the balance between policy and operational aspects, ensure that expertise is close to programming, keep transaction costs low, and avoid institutional fragmentation. |
Partially implemented |
|
Italy needs to elaborate a human resources plan for its development co-operation to match staffing needs and competence with DGCS’s general objectives, clarify the roles and division of labour between institutions and staff, and elaborate a human resource policy for local staff with appropriate training. |
Partially implemented |
Delivery modalities and partnerships
Copy link to Delivery modalities and partnerships|
Recommendations 2014 |
Progress in implementation |
|---|---|
|
Italy is encouraged to strengthen STREAM documents with appropriate analysis and estimates of future aid flows, and expand them to include all official interventions |
Not implemented |
|
There is ample room for Italy to promote sector-wide and programme approaches in its partner countries, and untie further its aid in line with international commitments. |
Not implemented |
|
The aid effectiveness marker has the potential to increase staff awareness of aid effectiveness and stimulate corrective action, provided it is carefully monitored with its results acted upon |
Partially implemented |
Results, evaluation and learning
Copy link to Results, evaluation and learning|
Recommendations 2014 |
Progress in implementation |
|---|---|
|
Italy should pursue efforts to build expected results into programming and budgeting processes, using partner countries’ data to the maximum extent. |
Partially implemented |
|
Establishing a medium-term evaluation plan based on clear criteria, as well as a management response system, would help DGCS use evaluations as a management tool. |
Implemented |
|
Setting up a knowledge management system to capitalise on experience would help inform decision-making and strengthen staff capacities. |
Not implemented |
|
DGCS should pursue efforts to communicate results and raise awareness on development issues. This would contribute to increasing the public and parliamentary support needed to sustain ODA increases |
Partially implemented |
Humanitarian assistance
Copy link to Humanitarian assistanceFigure A.1. Italy’s implementation of 2014 peer review recommendations
Copy link to Figure A.1. Italy’s implementation of 2014 peer review recommendations