178. Debt instruments include marketable securities, such as bonds, debentures, commercial paper, promissory notes, non-participating preference shares and other tradable non-equity securities as well as loans, deposits, trade credit and other accounts payable/receivable. All cross-border transactions related to these instruments between enterprises covered by a FDI relationship, other than between related financial intermediaries, are included in FDI.
179. Debt financing can flow in the same direction as the influence or control, i.e., from the investor to the DIE. In addition, a DIE may raise loans that they on-lend to their direct investor or may make loans to their direct investor from their own resources, so-called reverse investment. Such loans should be treated as direct investment debt and be included in the direct investment statistics.
180. Similarly, loans involving fellow enterprises should be included under debt in direct investment statistics. For example, B, a DIE of A, may raise funds that, under instructions from A, it lends to C, another DIE of A. Such transactions should be considered direct investment between the economy of B and the economy of C, even though there is no equity participation between B and C. Similarly, if a resident direct investor, A, has a DIE abroad, B, as well as a resident subsidiary, C, then C is, by definition, not a DIE of A, but B and C are fellow enterprises within the framework for direct investment relationships (FDIR) covering A, B, and C. Therefore, transactions between B and C should be recorded as direct investment.
181. Direct investors may make loans to or borrow funds from their indirectly owned DIEs. An indirect ownership interest exists when a DIE that is directly owned, in turn, has an equity holding in another non-resident DIE, thereby making the first DIE a direct investor in the second DIE. In this example, the direct investor at the top of the ownership chain holds an indirect ownership interest in the enterprise at the bottom of the ownership chain. Debt transactions between all these directly and indirectly owned enterprises should be included in direct investment if they meet the requirements of the FDIR (see Section 2.4.3).
182. Under the FDIR, if the indirect ownership in DIEs is not included in direct investment relationships, then some transactions between the direct investor and its indirectly owned DIEs may be excluded from the direct investment statistics as well as the corresponding earnings. While world-wide consolidated data cannot be used to construct FDI statistics, it is the case that economies that do not require their companies to produce world-wide consolidated company accounts may have difficulties in obtaining information on all indirectly owned subsidiaries and associates in order to produce direct investment statistics according to the FDIR.
183. A DIE or a fellow enterprise may also have loans or balances due to or from fellow enterprises abroad. None of these related enterprises needs to hold a 10% or more voting power in the other as long as they have, directly or indirectly, a common parent.
184. For each category of debt instrument, decreases in assets are deducted from increases in assets to derive the net transactions in assets within a given period, and similarly for liabilities. However, debt transactions between FDI-related financial intermediaries (such as commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions, mutual funds or finance companies) are excluded from direct investment (see Annex 6.A).
For debt instrument assets, included are transactions that increase or decrease:
the resident direct investor’s debt instrument claims on the DIE
the resident DIE’s debt instrument claims on direct investors
other resident fellow enterprises’ debt instrument claims on fellow enterprises abroad, distinguishing whether the ultimate controlling parent is resident or non-resident.
For debt instrument liabilities, included are transactions that increase or decrease:
the financial obligations of a resident DIE to direct investors
the financial obligations of a resident direct investor to DIEs
the financial obligations of other resident fellow enterprises to fellow enterprises abroad distinguishing whether the ultimate controlling parent is non-resident or resident.
185. When a direct investor lends funds to its DIE, the level of the direct investor’s claims (receivables) on the enterprise increases. Subsequently, when the DIE repays the principal owed to its direct investor, the level of the direct investor’s receivables from the enterprise is reduced. Similarly, when a direct investor borrows funds from its DIE, the level of the direct investor’s liabilities (payables) to the enterprise increases and when the direct investor repays the principal, the level of the direct investor’s payables is reduced. The same applies to fellow enterprises.
186. Increases in the resident’s receivables from, or reductions in the resident’s payables to, its foreign direct investor or fellow enterprises abroad give rise to outflows on inter-company debt accounts. Reductions in the resident’s receivables from, or increases in the resident’s payables to, its foreign direct investor or fellow enterprises abroad give rise to inflows.
187. The net change in inter-company debt includes changes in the value of financial (or capital) leases between direct investors and their related enterprises abroad. Financial leases are treated as loans. A financial lease is a contract under which a lessee contracts to pay rentals for the use of a good for most or all of its expected economic life. The rentals enable the lessor to recover most or all of the costs of goods and the carrying charges over the period of the contract. While there is not a legal change of ownership of the good, under a financial lease the risks and rewards of ownership are, de facto, transferred from the legal owner of the good, the lessor, to the user of the good, the lessee. For this reason, under statistical convention and standard accounting rules, the total value of the good is imputed to have changed ownership. So, the debt liability at the inception of the lease is defined as the value of the good and is financed by a loan of the same value, a liability of the lessee. The loan is repaid through a series of payments (which comprise a blend of the accrued interest since the last payment and principal payment elements) and any residual payment at the end of the contract (or alternatively, by the return of the good to the lessor).