Other sectors such as education, banking and finance, the media and aviation have been far better at harnessing the opportunities of digital technology to deliver improvements, efficiencies and consumer surpluses.
The transformation in these sectors did not come about by simply digitising existing practices. It required an overhaul of organisational structures, business models and institutions. It relied on fundamental changes to cultures, habits and attitudes. Reform on this scale also needed considerable investment.
In contrast, health systems remain ‘data rich but information poor’. Many opportunities to improve the health of individuals and communities remain untapped. The available data and technologies are sufficient, but are insufficiently implemented and used. This is primarily a legacy of institutions, forged in the pre-digital era, that are static and resistant to change. The potential of digital technology has, in fact, highlighted the need to urgently address some long-standing problems such as fragmentation and silo mentality, which get in the way of important reforms.
Investment plays an important role. Countries typically spend less than 5% of health budgets on managing data and information – a much smaller share than other sectors, and paltry for an industry where accurate, reliable and timely information is so critical to success.
As it stands, only a minority of OECD countries are establishing the requirements for digital transformation of their health systems. Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Israel, Lithuania, New Zealand, Norway and Sweden, for example, are making good progress. However, even the frontrunners have a long way to go. Systematic re-purposing of routine data for analysis and knowledge-creation, in particular, remain a major challenge.