Enhancing the Public Procurement Performance Measurement Framework in Hungary
Annex A. List of indicators of the Hungarian public procurement measurement framework
Copy link to Annex A. List of indicators of the Hungarian public procurement measurement framework|
Category |
Sub-category |
Indicator |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Number of public procurement challenges |
|
2 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Distribution of ex officio initiators |
|
3 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Share of public procurement challenges out of the total number of public procurement procedures |
|
4 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Share of successful public procurement challenges |
|
5 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Share of public procurement procedures with a request for a preliminary dispute settlement as a percentage of all public procurement procedures |
|
6 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Number of notifications of public interest received by the Public Procurement Authority |
|
7 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Number of launched review procedures based on notifications of public interest received by the Public Procurement Authority |
|
8 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Cost of public procurement challenges |
|
9 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Average duration of redress procedures |
|
10 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Number and share of judicial reviews in the number of appeals |
|
11 |
Compliance |
Effectiveness of the remedies |
Number and percentage of challenges by contracting authorities against themselves out of the total number of challenges |
|
12 |
Compliance |
Legal compliance |
Number of infringements broken down by the legal provision infringed |
|
13 |
Compliance |
Transparency |
Share of lots (in numbers) of public procurement procedures launched by public notice among the lots awarded |
|
14 |
Compliance |
Transparency |
Share of negotiated procedures without prior publication of a contract notice |
|
15 |
Compliance |
Transparency |
Share of lots (in numbers) of public procurement procedures conducted under Article 115 of the PPA |
|
16 |
Compliance |
Transparency |
Share of lots (in values) of public procurement procedures conducted under Article 115 of the PPA |
|
17 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Average time, in days, between the publication of the call for tender and the publication of the report on the award of the contract |
|
18 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Average time in days between the publication of the call for tender and the bid submission deadline |
|
19 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Average time in days between the bid submission deadline and the publication of the summary |
|
20 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Share of unsuccessful lots |
|
21 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Share of each reason of unsuccessful lots |
|
22 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Number and share of lots using efficient procurement techniques |
|
23 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Average duration of framework agreements |
|
24 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Share of framework agreements concluded with one or multiple operators |
|
25 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Share of lots awarded in public procurement procedures using each evaluation criteria |
|
26 |
Efficiency |
Efficiency of public procurement procedures |
Share of procurement procedures broken down into lots (as a percentage of the number of successful procurement procedures) |
|
27 |
Efficiency |
Cost-effectiveness /administrative costs |
Cost for contracting authorities of running a public procurement procedure |
|
28 |
Efficiency |
Cost-effectiveness /administrative costs |
Cost for economic operators of bidding in a public procurement procedure |
|
29 |
Efficiency |
Cost-effectiveness /administrative costs |
Ratio of the estimated value of lots to the contract price for the awarded lots in public procurement procedures |
|
30 |
Efficiency |
Cost-effectiveness /administrative costs |
Share of number of lots in which a tendering security has been lodged in respect of the number of lots awarded |
|
31 |
Efficiency |
Effectiveness of contract performance |
Share of the number of contracts that were fully terminated in the course of contract performance |
|
32 |
Efficiency |
Effectiveness of contract performance |
Share in value of contracts that were fully terminated in the course of contract performance |
|
33 |
Efficiency |
Effectiveness of contract performance |
Number and share of contracts affected by contract modification |
|
34 |
Efficiency |
Effectiveness of contract performance |
Share of number of contracts where there was a delay in the performance of the contract (compared to the originally planned deadline) |
|
35 |
Efficiency |
Effectiveness of contract performance |
Share of contracts affected by cost overruns |
|
36 |
Efficiency |
Competition |
Number of preliminary market consultations |
|
37 |
Efficiency |
Competition |
Number of comments received during preliminary market consultations |
|
38 |
Efficiency |
Competition |
Share in number of lots awarded to one bidder |
|
39 |
Efficiency |
Competition |
Share in value of lots awarded to one bidder |
|
40 |
Efficiency |
Competition |
Median number of bids received per lots awarded |
|
41 |
Efficiency |
Competition |
Mode number of bids received per lots awarded |
|
42 |
Efficiency |
Competition |
Number of decisions establishing a breach by the Competition Authority in public procurement cartel cases |
|
43 |
Efficiency |
Capacity |
The organisation has its own methodology for measuring its procurement performance |
|
44 |
Efficiency |
Capacity |
Use of services of an external consultant with expertise in the subject matter of the procurement have been used by the organisation |
|
45 |
Efficiency |
Capacity |
Employment of an Accredited Public Procurement consultant or a procurement expert to perform procurement consultancy tasks |
|
46 |
Efficiency |
Capacity |
Reasons for the organisation to use the services of an external consultant |
|
47 |
Efficiency |
Capacity |
Percentage of procedures involving external experts |
|
48 |
Efficiency |
Capacity |
Number of staff involved in public procurement |
|
49 |
Efficiency |
Capacity |
Number of staff with higher vocational training in public procurement |
|
50 |
Efficiency |
Capacity |
Number of staff involved in the management of public procurement procedures in the institution who have received external or internal training in public procurement in a given year |
|
51 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Number of contracting authorities using CPB services per CPB in a given year |
|
52 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Number of contracts concluded under framework agreements or dynamic purchasing systems of CPBs per CPB in a given year |
|
53 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Number of contracts concluded with SMEs/CPB in a given year |
|
54 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Number of requests received by CPB from contracting authorities to conduct procurement procedures by themselves. |
|
55 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Number of procurement procedures that have been referred back for own responsibility by the CPB |
|
56 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Share of the value of successful purchases conducted in a specific year under the framework agreement to the total value of the framework agreement concluded / CPB |
|
57 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Procurement capacity in each CPB in a specific year (in number) |
|
58 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Staff with a postgraduate certificate on public procurement/ CPB |
|
59 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Number and percentage of staff trained externally or internally in public procurement in a given year /CPB |
|
60 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Use of CPBs of external consultants for the implementation of public procurement procedure (Yes/no) |
|
61 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Average use by a CPB of accredited procurement consultants services for procurement consultancy tasks per 10 procedures. |
|
62 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Share of procurement procedures of CPBs involving the services of external consultants for public works per CPB |
|
63 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Share of procurement procedures of CPBs involving the services of external consultants for services per CPB |
|
64 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Share of procurement procedures of CPBs involving the services of external consultants for goods per CPB |
|
65 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Existence of a system to monitor market price evolution of procurement items covered by FAs/ CPB |
|
66 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Percentage of price reduction compared to the original price as a result of reopening competition for a given year |
|
67 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
percentage of savings achieved through centralisation in a given year (compared to market price) |
|
6 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Percentage of time savings achieved through centralisation |
|
69 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Operation of an online marketplace or catalogue specifically for procurement below the threshold/CPB |
|
70 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Frequency of conducting a preliminary market analysis before launching public procurement procedures |
|
71 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Existence of a methodology for the preliminary assessment of procurement needs |
|
72 |
Efficiency |
Centralisation |
Existence of a framework for measuring the effectiveness of the public procurement procedures carried out (indicators for monitoring the effectiveness of the CPB and of each procurement procedure and their evaluation) |
|
73 |
Strategic |
|
Share of lots with environmental aspects (in numbers) |
|
74 |
Strategic |
|
Share of lots with social aspects (in numbers) |
|
75 |
Strategic |
Share in number of lots awarded to micro and SMEs |
|
|
76 |
Strategic |
Share of bids submitted by micro and SMEs (among the valid bids) |
|
|
77 |
Strategic |
|
Share of contracts awarded (in numbers) where the full life cycle of the contract or life cycle costing was taken into account |